A peer-reviewed electronic journal published by the Institute for Ethics and
Emerging Technologies

ISSN 1541-0099


call for papers

editorial board

how to submit to JET

support JET & IEET

search JET


Microbivores: Artificial Mechanical Phagocytes
using Digest and Discharge Protocol

Robert A. Freitas Jr.
Senior Research Fellow, Institute for Molecular Manufacturing

 Journal of Evolution and Technology  -  Vol. 14 - April 2005

  PDF Version



Nanomedicine offers the prospect of powerful new tools for the treatment of human diseases and the improvement of human biological systems using molecular nanotechnology. This paper presents a theoretical nanorobot scaling study for artificial mechanical phagocytes of microscopic size, called "microbivores," whose primary function is to destroy microbiological pathogens found in the human bloodstream using a digest and discharge protocol. The microbivore is an oblate spheroidal nanomedical device measuring 3.4 microns in diameter along its major axis and 2.0 microns in diameter along its minor axis, consisting of 610 billion precisely arranged structural atoms in a gross geometric volume of 12.1 micron3. The device may consume up to 200 pW of continuous power while completely digesting trapped microbes at a maximum throughput of 2 micron3 of organic material per 30-second cycle. Microbivores are up to ~1000 times faster-acting than either natural or antibiotic-assisted biological phagocytic defenses, and are ~80 times more efficient as phagocytic agents than macrophages, in terms of volume/sec digested per unit volume of phagocytic agent.


1.   Introduction
2.   Sepsis and Septicemia
    2.1   Bacteremia
        2.1.1   Gram-positive Bacteremia and Current Therapy
        2.1.2   Gram-negative Bacteremia and Current Therapy
        2.1.3   Phage Therapy
        2.1.4   Bacterial Shape, Size, and Intravenous LD50
    2.2   Viremia
    2.3   Fungemia
    2.4   Parasitemia and Rickettsemia
3.   Microbivore Scaling Analysis and Baseline Design
    3.1   Primary Phagocytic Systems
        3.1.1   Reversible Microbial Binding Sites
        3.1.2   Telescoping Grapples
        3.1.3   Ingestion Port and Morcellation Chamber
        3.1.4   Digestion Chamber and Exhaust Port
     Artificial Enzyme Suite
     Digestion Cycle Time
         Speed of Enzymatic Action
         Speed of Enzyme-Transport Rotors
     Summary of Digestion Systems
     Ejection Piston and Exhaust Port
    3.2   Microbivore Support Systems
        3.2.1   Power Supply and Fuel Buffer Tankage
        3.2.2   Sensors
        3.2.3   Onboard Computers
        3.2.4   Structural Support
        3.2.5   Ballasting for Nanapheresis
4.   Microbivore Performance and Applications
    4.1   Phagocytic Activity of Microbivores
    4.2   Microbivore Pharmacokinetics
    4.3   Microbivore Biocompatibility
    4.4   Extended Applications
        4.4.1   Infections of Meninges and Cerebrospinal Fluid
        4.4.2   Systemic Inflammatory Cytokine Management
        4.4.3   Biofilm Digestion
        4.4.4   Bacterial Infections in Other Fluids and Tissues
        4.4.5   Viral, Fungal, and Parasitic Infections
        4.4.6   Other Applications
5.   Conclusions
6.   Acknowledgements
7.   References

1. Introduction

Nanomedicine [1, LINK; 192, LINK] offers the prospect of powerful new tools for the treatment of human diseases and the improvement of human biological systems. Previous papers have explored theoretical designs for artificial mechanical red cells (respirocytes [2, LINK]) and artificial mechanical platelets (clottocytes [3, LINK]). This paper presents a scaling study for artificial mechanical phagocytes of microscopic size, called "microbivores." Microbivores constitute a large class of medical nanorobots intended to be deployed in human patients for a wide variety of antimicrobial therapeutic purposes, as, for example, a first-line response to septicemia. The analysis here focuses on a relatively simple device: an intravenous (I.V.) microbivore whose primary function is to destroy microbiological pathogens found in the human bloodstream, using the "digest and discharge" protocol first described by the author elsewhere [1, LINK, LINK]. A separate analysis would be required to design devices intended to clear bacterial infections from nonsanguinous spaces such as the tissues, though such devices would undoubtedly have much in common with the microbivores described herein.

After a basic overview of current approaches to sepsis and septicemia that defines the medical challenge, the basic microbivore scaling design is presented, followed by a brief analysis of the phagocytic activity and pharmacokinetics of bloodborne nanorobotic microbivores. As a scaling study, this paper serves mainly to demonstrate that all systems required for mechanical phagocytosis could fit into the stated volumes and could apply the necessary forces and perform all essential functions within the given power limits and time allotments. This scaling study is neither a complete design nor a formal design proposal.

2. Sepsis and Septicemia

Sepsis [4] is a pathological state, usually febrile, resulting from the presence of microorganisms or their poisonous products in the bloodstream [5]. Microbial infection may manifest as cellulitis (local dissemination of infection), lymphangitis or lymphadenitis (dispersion along lymphatic channels) or septicemia (widespread dissemination via the bloodstream). Septicemia, also known as blood poisoning, is the presence of pathogenic microorganisms in the blood. If allowed to progress, these microorganisms may multiply and cause an overwhelming infection. Symptoms include chills and fever, petechiae (small purplish skin spots), purpuric pustules and abscesses. Acute septicemia, which includes tachycardia, tachypnea, and altered mental function, may combine with hypotension and inadequate organ perfusion as septic shock -- the resulting decreased myocardial contractility and circulatory failure can lead to widespread tissue injury and eventually multiple organ failure and death [5], often in as few as 1-3 days. Risk is especially high for immune-compromised individuals -- in one animal study, the LD50* for mice rendered leukopenic (defined as <10% normal leukocrit) was less than 20 bacteria of the species Pseudomonas aeruginosa [6]. Asplenic patients are particularly susceptible to rapidly progressive sepsis from encapsulated microorganisms such as streptococcal pneumonia, hemophilus influenza and meningococcus, and will die if the infection is not recognized rapidly and treated aggressively.

Septicemia may be caused by several different classes of pathogenic organisms, most commonly identified as bacteria (bacteremia; Section 2.1), viruses (viremia; Section 2.2), fungi (fungemia; Section 2.3), parasites (parasitemia; Section 2.4) and rickettsiae (rickettsemia; Section 2.4).

* LD50 refers to the mean lethal dose which will kill 50% of the animals receiving that dose.

2.1 Bacteremia

The healthy human bloodstream is generally considered a sterile environment. Although bacterial nutrients are plentiful in blood, major antimicrobial defenses include the circulating neutrophils and monocytes capable of phagocytosis and the supporting components of humoral immunity including complement and immunoglobulins.

Still, it is not unusual to find a few bacteria in blood. Normal activities like chewing, brushing or flossing teeth causes movement of teeth in their sockets, infusing a burst of commensal oral microbes into the bloodstream [7]. Bacteria can enter the blood via an injury to the skin, the lining of the mouth or gums, or from gingivitis or other minor infections in the skin and elsewhere [8]. Bacteremias from a focus of infection are usually intermittent, while those from vascular system infection tend to be continuous [7], such as endocarditis or embolism from heart valve vegetations in subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE), sometimes leading to infectious mycotic (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus) aneurysms.

Bacteria can also enter the blood during surgical, dental, or other medical procedures [8] such as the insertion of I.V. lines (providing fluids, nutrition or medications), cystoscopy (a viewing tube inserted to examine the bladder), colonoscopy (a viewing tube inserted to view the colon), or heart valve replacement with a prosthetic (thankfully now rare, due to heavy preoperative dosing with cefazolin). Such bacteria are normally removed by circulating leukocytes (along with the fixed reticuloendothelial cells in the spleen, liver, and lungs), but a few species of bacteria are unusually virulent and can overwhelm the natural defenses. The CDC estimates that ~25,000 U.S. patients die each year from bacterial sepsis [9]. Worldwide, there are ~1.5 million cases of sepsis and ~0.5 million deaths from sepsis annually. Antibiotics can fight sepsis, pressors can relieve hypotension from sepsis, volume replacement and I.V. albumin or HESPAN (hetastarch) can offset hypovolemia, but until recently there have been no pharmacological agents approved to fight the complications of coagulation and inflammation due to bacterial endotoxin (Section 4.4.2) (which can still lead to a mortality rate of 30%-50% [10]) although antiendotoxin peptides [242] and anti-LPS monoclonal antibodies [243] are being investigated for this purpose.

2.1.1 Gram-positive Bacteremia and Current Therapy

Gram-positive bacteria that may infect the human bloodstream include Erysipelothrix rhusiopathia (erysipelothricosis), Listeria monocytogenes (listeriosis), Staphylococcus aureus (staph bacteremia), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (bacteremic pneumonia; group A beta-hemolytic streptococci also cause "flesh-eating" necrotizing fasciitis, often fatal in 24 hours).

The recommended duration of therapy even for uncomplicated cases of S. aureus bacteremia arising from a removable source is 2-9 grams/day of antibiotics given I.V. for 2 weeks [11], after which 5% of patients still relapse, usually with endocarditis. Endocarditis accompanying bacteremic pneumonia in years past might require a treatment regimen of penicillin G potassium in the quantity of 24 million units/day, representing 15 grams/day dissolved in a minimum I.V. infusate volume of 24 ml/day, for 4 weeks [11, 12]; the current most aggressive treatment is 0.5-2 gm/day vancomycin orally for 7-10 days [12], often together with 1-4 gm/day ceftriaxone and possibly also a similar dose of teichoplanin (antibiotics of last resort, due to potential toxicity).

2.1.2 Gram-negative Bacteremia and Current Therapy

Gram negative bacteria that may infect the human bloodstream include Bartonella henselae (cat scratch disease), Brucella (brucellosis or undulant fever), Campylobacter, Francisella tularensis (tularemia), Klebsiella, Moraxella catarrhalis (in immunocompromised patients), Neisseria, Proteus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (e.g., bacteremic Pseudomonas pneumonia is rare but carries high mortality [13]), Yersinia pestis (septicemic plague), and various bacillary enterobacteria such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Shigella. There are several hundred thousand episodes of gram-negative sepsis annually [11]. If not treated promptly, neutropenic or immunosuppressed patients have a 40-60% mortality rate; patients with diseases likely to prove fatal in <5 years (e.g., solid tumors, severe liver disease, aplastic anemia) have a 15-20% mortality rate; and patients with no underlying disease have a <5% mortality rate if promptly treated with intensive courses of antibiotics [11].

Treatment for brucellosis involves gram/day intramuscular streptomycin injections (use generally curtailed; side effect is deafness) plus an oral 1-2 gram/day multiple-antibiotic regimen lasting 3 weeks [11], and longer courses of therapy lasting several months may be required to cure relapses [11]. Doses up to 12 gm/day of Ancef (cefazolin) have been used for severe septicemia [12]. Acute enterobacteremia may require enormous daily treatment doses of penicillin G, typically 20-80 million units or 12.5-50 grams/day, administered I.V. [12]. Evolving antibiotic resistance is an increasing problem, particularly vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, which is developing at an alarming rate among immunocompromised hospitalized patients (but often responds to 1-4 gm/day of erythromycin for 1-2 weeks).

2.1.3 Phage Therapy

An interesting emerging alternative to antibiotic therapy -- and a small step towards nanomedicine -- is phage therapy [14-27]. Bacteriophage viruses are tiny biological nanomachines that were first employed against bacteria by d'Herelle in 1922 [14] but were abandoned therapeutically (and then superceded by antibiotics) after disappointments in early trials [22]. Bacteriophages may be viewed as self-replicating pharmaceutical agents [26] that can consume and destroy pathogenic bacteria when injected into infected hosts. A single E. coli cell injected with a single T4 phage at 37C in rich media lyses after 25-30 minutes, releasing 100-200 phage particles; if additional T4 particles are added >4 minutes after the first, lysis inhibition is the result and the bacterium will produce virions for up to 6 hours before it finally lyses [15]. Of course, medical nanorobots will not be self-replicating [1].

With the relatively recent realization that phages have a very narrow host range [27], success rates of 80-95% have been reported [23] and interest in phage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics is reawakening [25]. For example, 106 E. coli bacteria injected intramuscularly into mice killed all of the animals (100% mortality), but the simultaneous injection of 104 phage virions specifically selected against the K1 capsule antigen of that bacterial strain of E. coli completely prevented death (0% mortality) [17]. Soothill [19] found that a dose of 1.2 107 virions of a bacteriophage targeted against a virulent strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa protected half of the mice who were challenged with 5 LD50 of the bacterium; as few as 100 virions of another phage specifically targeted against a virulent strain of Acinetobacter baumanii protected mice challenged with 5 LD50 (108 CFU)* of the pathogen. Interestingly, an oncolytic virus has recently been reported [31].

One practical difficulty with phage therapy is that even in the absence of an immune response, intravenous therapeutic phage particles are rapidly eliminated from circulation by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), largely by sequestration in the spleen [16]. But Merril et al [27] found that splenic capture could be greatly eliminated by the serial passage of phage through the circulations of mice to isolate mutants that resist sequestration. This selection process results in the modification of the nature of the phage surface proteins, via a double-charge change from acidic to basic which is achieved by replacing glutamic acid (- charge) with lysine (+ charge) at the solvent-exposed surface of the phage virion [27]. The mutant virions display 13,000-fold to 16,000-fold greater capacity to evade RES entrapment 24 hours post-injection as compared to the original phage [27]. But one concern is that since evasion of entrapment allows increased virulence for most pathogens, widespread use of such modified virus could make possible species jumping of the altered phage genes, especially if the virion is RNA-based and has a high mutation rate. Nanorobotic agents entirely avoid this risk.

* The number of bacterial cells present is often reported as colony-forming units, or CFU.

2.1.4 Bacterial Shape, Size, and Intravenous LD50

Bacteria are unicellular microorganisms capable of independent metabolism, growth, and replication. Their shapes are generally spherical or ovoid (cocci), cylindrical or rodlike (bacilli), and curved-rod, spiral or comma-like (spirilla). Bacilli may remain associated after cell division and form colonies configured like strings of sausages. Bacteria range in size from 0.2-2 microns in width or diameter, and from 1-10 microns in length for the nonspherical species; the largest known bacterium is Thiomargarita namibiensis, with spheroidal diameters from 100-750 microns [32]. Spherical bacteria as small as 50 nm in diameter have been reported [33] and disputed [34], but it has been theorized [35] that the smallest possible cell size into which the minimum essential molecular machinery can be contained within a membrane is a diameter of ~40-50 nm. Many spherical bacteria are ~1 micron in diameter; an average rod or short spiral cell might be ~1 micron wide and 3-5 microns long. However, most bacteria involved in bacteremia and sepsis are <2 micron3 in volume (Table 1).


Table 1. Size and Shape of Microbes Most Commonly Involved in Bacteremia [36]
Bacterial Species Shape Diameter (micron) Length (micron) Volume (micron3)
Francisella tularensis rod 0.2 0.3-0.7 0.01-0.02
Klebsiella pneumoniae ovoid 0.4 ---- 0.05
Campylobacter spp. rod 0.2-0.4 1.5-3.5 0.05-0.50
Vibrio cholerae rod 0.3 1.3 0.10
Streptococcus pyogenes ovoid 0.6-1.0 ---- 0.10-0.50
Pseudomonas aeruginosa rod 0.3-0.5 1-3 0.10-0.60
Brucella spp. rod 0.5-0.7 0.5-1.5 0.10-0.60
Yersinia pestis rod 0.4-0.8 0.8-3 0.10-1.50
Listeria monocytogenes rod 0.5 1.3 0.25
Erysipelothrix rhusiop. rod 0.5 1.3 0.25
Salmonella typhi rod 0.4-0.6 2-3 0.25-0.85
Escherichia coli rod 0.5-0.65 1.7-2.0 0.33-0.66
Staphylococcus spp. sphere 0.5-1.5 ---- 0.07-1.75
Neisseria spp. sphere 1 ---- 0.50
Moraxella catarrhalis rod 1 2-3 1.60-2.35
Shigella spp. rod 1 2-3 1.60-2.35

The intravenous median lethal dose (LD50) for 50% of hosts inoculated with various bacteremic microorganisms ranges widely from 1-109 CFU/gm (Table 2), but the central range appears to be 0.1-100 106 CFU/ml assuming a ~1 gm/cm3 density for biological materials.


Table 2. LD50 for Bacteremias Caused by Intravenous Microbial Challenge 
Pathogenic Microorganism Animal Model LD50 (CFU/gm) Ref.
Salmonella typhimurium mouse I.V. <0.50 37
Yersinia pestis mouse I.V. <0.60 38
Francisella tularensis mouse I.V. ~0.5-25 39
Pseudomonas aeruginosa leukopenic mouse I.V.   6
Streptococcus pneumoniae asplenic infant rats I.V. ~2  40
Streptococcus pneumoniae normal infant rats I.V. ~20  40
Staphylococcus, Streptococcus,
Bacillus, and
E. coli
canine mesenteric
lymph tissue
0.0001-0.1 106 41
Mutant htrA Salmonella typhimurium
strain BRD 915
mouse I.V.  0.028 106 37
Staphylococcus aureus leukopenic mouse I.V. >0.05 106   6
Escherichia coli leukopenic mouse I.V. >0.05 106 30
Klebsiella pneumoniae leukopenic mouse I.V. 0.075 106   6
Escherichia coli mouse I.V. 0.11 106 28
Staphylococcus aureus BB  mouse I.V.  0.12-0.19 106 42
Staphylococcus aureus mouse I.V. ~0.3 106 43
Acinetobacter baumanii mouse I.V. 0.5 106 19
Group B streptococci  mouse I.V.  0.5-5 106
(produced 50-90%
incidence of arthritis)
Salmonella typhimurium, strain GBV311,
mutant rpoE-deficient
mouse I.V.  0.62 106 37
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, mucoid strains mouse I.V.  0.75 106 45
Escherichia coli rats I.P. 1 106 46
Staphylococcus aureus, strain RC 108 mouse I.P.  1.2 106 47
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, various strains mouse I.P.  0.022-1.9 106 48
Staphylococcus aureus BB  immunized mouse I.V. 2.1 106 42
Escherichia coli (induced septicemia) piglets I.V.  2.5 106 29
Staphylococcus aureus BB,
mutant coagulase-deficient plus culture filtrate
mouse I.V.  6.5 106 42
Staphylococcus aureus methicillin-sensitive mouse inoculum 7.6 106 49
Escherichia coli mouse I.V.  4-35 106
(100% fatality)
Staphylococcus aureus methicillin-resistant mouse inoculum 50 106 49
Staphylococcus aureus BB, mutant coagulase-deficient mouse I.V.  86 106 42
Streptococcus group B  mouse I.V.  100 106
(blood count at/near death)
Staphylococcus aureus BB  mouse I.V.  800 106
(viable microbes,
3 days, renal tissue)
Staphylococcus aureus, strain RC122, avirulent mutant mouse I.P.  1550 106 47

I.V. -- intravenous
I.P. -- intraperitoneal
leukopenic -- low white cell count



2.2 Viremia

Viremia is the presence of virus particles in the bloodstream, usually a transient condition [7]. Viruses are acellular bioactive parasites that attack virtually every form of cellular life. Viruses have diameters ranging from 16-300 nm [52] -- for example, poliomyelitis ~18 nm, yellow fever ~25 nm, adenovirus (common cold) ~70 nm, influenza (flu) ~100 nm, herpes simplex and rabies ~125 nm, and psittacosis ~275 nm [53]. Their shape is either pseudospherical with icosahedral symmetry, as in the poliomyelitis virus, or rodlike, as in the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). A virus surrounded only by protein coat (capsid) is a naked virus; some viruses (e.g., HIV, HSV, pox), called enveloped viruses, acquire a lipid membrane envelope from their host cell upon release.

In cases of blood plasma viremia, virion particle counts range from 1/ml to 0.35 106/ml for HIV in humans [54-56], with a mean of 25/ml for asymptomatic patients; viral loads for simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in monkeys may be much higher, 2-200 106/ml of blood [57]. Hepatitis C (HCV) [58] infectious viral loads (at ~10-18 gm/virion) are considered low at 0.2-1 106/ml, medium at 1-5 106/ml, high at 5-25 106/ml, and very high at >25 106/ml. Hepatitis G (HGV) [59] viral loads in symptomatic patients are 0.16-5.1 106/ml. TT virus (TTV) [60] loads in HIV patients may exceed >0.35 106/ml. Thus the typical blood particle burdens in viremia are much the same as in bacteremia, roughly 0.1-100 106/ml. Viral infections can be very difficult to eradicate pharmaceutically, as most treatments are virustatic, not virucidal. For example, acute treatment of herpesvirus requires 2 grams/day of acyclovir, with chronic suppressive therapy for recurrent disease requiring 0.8 grams/day for up to 12 months [12].

2.3 Fungemia

In severely immunocompromised patients, fungi may gain access to the bloodstream, producing fungemia [7]. Fungal cells in peripheral blood are typically ovoid to elongated, from 3 3 microns up to 7 10 microns in size, and occur singly, budding, or in short chains and clusters [61]. Candidal fungemia is most common; Candida albicans blood counts in human patients are considered "ultralow" at < 1 CFU/ml and "low" at 1-3 CFU/ml in neonates [62], but "high" at > 5 CFU/ml in adult patients [63]; in one test series, fungemic patients showed 5.5 CFU/ml in venous blood and 9.1 CFU/ml in arterial blood, suggesting that peripheral tissues may clear ~40% of yeasts [64]. Rats injected with ~100 106 CFU/ml of C. albicans all died in < ~6 hours from nonendotoxemic (i.e., non-LPS related) shock [65].

Patients with catheter-related fungemia due to fungus counts of Malassezia furfur at 50-1000 CFU/ml required antibiotic treatment [66], and catheter-related Rhodotorula (red yeast) infected patients with colony counts in the 100-1000 CFU/ml range required antifungal therapy [67]. Human bloodstream fungal infections thus appear to range from 1-1000 CFU/ml. Disseminated (systemic) candidiasis is effectively managed with 0.2 gm/day of fluconazole for at least 4 weeks [12]. Coccidioides immitis fungal infection is treated with ~0.02 gm/day (~200 ml/day I.V. drip solution via Ommaya reservoir into the brain ventricles) of amphotericin B for up to 9-11 months [12] (very toxic, with overdose leading to cardio-respiratory arrest; typically dosed as total cumulative). Respiratory fungal histoplasmosis (Histoplasma capulatum) may be treated with oral doses of itraconazole at 0.2-0.5 gm/day for a minimum of 3 months [12].

2.4 Parasitemia and Rickettsemia

Parasitemia arises from parasites that have evolved to live in the bloodstream include the Plasmodium (malaria) family and the flagellate protozoans Trypanosoma (sleeping sickness) and Leishmania (leishmaniasis). Blood parasites typically have a juvenile form that is ovoid or ring-shaped with dimensions of 1-5 microns, and an adult tubular form measuring 1-5 microns in width and 10-30 microns in length [68]. In Trypanosoma brucei, the number of trypanosomes in blood fluctuates in waves, and the organisms are typically undetectable for 3 out of 5 days [69]. Trypomastigotes have an I.V. LD50 in mice of ~2.5/gm [70, 71]. Trypanosoma brucei gambiense inoculated into mice has an LD50 of 0.02-0.15 106 trypanosomes/gm, with growth rates slowing at organism blood concentrations > 300 106 trypanosomes/ml and death occurring at a blood parasite load of 2000 106 trypanosomes/ml [72]. Malaria may be treated with several oral doses of chloroquine phosphate totalling 2.5 gm over three days, but there is increasing microbial resistance to chloroquine worldwide and as little as 1 gm of the medicine can be fatal in children, with toxic symptoms appearing within minutes of overdosage [12]; a single 1.25 gm dose of mefloquine is sometimes effective in mild cases [12].

Rickettsia are rod-shaped or coccoid gram-negative obligate intracellular parasites ~0.25 microns in diameter that in humans grow principally in endothelial cells of small blood vessels, producing vasculitis, cell necrosis, vessel thrombosis, skin rashes and organ dysfunctions [73]. The infection is characterized by repetitive cycles of bloodborne organisms, or rickettsemia. For example, in cattle the number of pathogens in the blood varies between a low of 100/ml and a peak of 1-10 106/ml over 6-8 week intervals; in each cycle, the blood count slowly rises over 10-14 days and then declines precipitously [74]. However, most of these parasites are found in the red cells, and the organism's appearance in the blood plasma is incidental to its activity. Plasma titers for free R. rickettsii organisms in the blood of human patients with Rocky Mountain spotted fever averaged 5-16 parasites/ml in treated patients who survived, and 1000 parasites/ml in the postmortem plasma of one patient with untreated fatal fulminant fever [75]. Antibiotic therapy has reduced the death rate from 20% to about 7%, with death usually occurring when treatment is delayed [8].

3. Microbivore Scaling Analysis and Baseline Design

The foregoing review suggests that existing treatments for many septicemic agents often require large quantities of medications that must be applied over long periods of time, and often achieve only incomplete eradication, or merely growth arrest, of the pathogen. A nanorobotic device that could safely provide quick and complete eradication of bloodborne pathogens using relatively low doses of devices would be a welcome addition to the physician's therapeutic armamentarium. The following analysis assumes a bacterial target (e.g. bacteremia), although other targets are readily substituted (Section 4.4).

The microbivore is an oblate spheroidal nanomedical device consisting of 610 billion precisely arranged structural atoms plus another 150 billion mostly gas or water molecules when fully loaded (Section 3.2.5). The nanorobot measures 3.4 microns in diameter along its major axis and 2.0 microns in diameter along its minor axis, thus ensuring ready passage through even the narrowest of human capillaries (~4 microns in diameter [1, LINK]). Its gross geometric volume of 12.1056 micron3 includes two normally empty internal materials processing chambers totalling 4 micron3 in displaced volume. The device may consume up to 200 pW of continuous power while in operation and can completely digest trapped microbes at a maximum throughput of 2 micron3 per 30-second cycle, large enough to internalize almost all relevant microbes in a single gulp. As in previous designs [2], to help ensure high reliability the system presented here has tenfold redundancy in all major components, excluding only the largest passive structural elements.

During each cycle of operation, the target bacterium is bound to the surface of the microbivore via species-specific reversible binding sites [1, LINK]. Telescoping robotic grapples emerge from silos in the device surface, establish secure anchorage to the microbe's plasma membrane, then transport the pathogen to the ingestion port at the front of the device where the cell is internalized into a morcellation chamber. After sufficient mechanical mincing, the morcellated remains are pistoned into a digestion chamber where a preprogrammed sequence of engineered enzymes are successively injected and extracted, reducing the morcellate primarily to monoresidue amino acids, mononucleotides, glycerol, free fatty acids and simple sugars, which are then harmlessly discharged into the environment through an exhaust port at the rear of the device, completing the cycle.

This "digest and discharge" protocol [1, LINK, LINK] is conceptually similar to the internalization and digestion process practiced by natural phagocytes, but the artificial process should be much faster and cleaner. For example, it is well-known that macrophages release biologically active compounds such as muramyl peptides during bacteriophagy [76], whereas well-designed microbivores need only release biologically inactive effluent.

3.1 Primary Phagocytic Systems

The principal activity which drives microbivore scaling and design is the process of digestion of organic substances, which also has some similarity to the digestion of food. The microbivore digestive system has four fundamental components -- an array of reversible binding sites to initially bind and trap target microbes (Section 3.1.1), an array of telescoping grapples to manipulate the microbe, once trapped (Section 3.1.2), a morcellation chamber in which the microbe is minced into small, easily digested pieces (Section 3.1.3), and a digestion chamber where the small pieces are chemically digested (Section 3.1.4).

3.1.1 Reversible Microbial Binding Sites

The first function the microbivore must perform is to acquire a pathogen to be digested. A collision between a bacterium of the target species and the nanorobotic device brings their surfaces into intimate contact, allowing reversible binding sites on the microbivore hull to recognize and weakly bind to the bacterium. Binding sites can already be engineered [77, 78]. Bacterial membranes are quite distinctive, including such obvious markers as the family of outer-membrane trimeric channel proteins called porins in gram-negative bacteria like E. coli [79, 80] and other surface proteins such as Staphylococcal protein A [81] or endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide or LPS), a variable-size carbohydrate chain that is the major antigen of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. Mycobacteria contain mycolic acid in their cell walls [82]. And only bacteria employ right-handed amino acids in their cellular coats, which helps them resist attack by digestive enzymes in the stomach and by other organisms. Peptidoglycans, the main structural component of bacterial walls, are cross-linked with peptide bridges that contain several unusual nonprotein amino acids and D-enantiomeric forms of Ala, Glu, and Asp [83]. D-alanine is the most abundant D-amino acid found in most peptidoglycans and the only one that is universally incorporated [84]. Macrophages have evolved a variety of plasma membrane receptors that recognize conserved motifs having essential biological roles for pathogens, hence the surface motifs are not subject to high mutation rates; these pathogen receptors on macrophages have been called "pattern recognition receptors" and their targets "pathogen-associated molecular paterns" [246]. Genomic differences between virulent and non-pathogenic bacterial strains [85] likely produce phenotypic differences that could enable the biasing of nanorobots towards the detection of the more toxic variants, if necessary.

Additionally, all bacteria of a given species express numerous unique proteins in their outermost coat. A complete review is beyond the scope of this paper, but a few representative examples can be cited. Each single-celled Staphylococcus aureus organism displays binding sites for human vitronectin on its surface, including 260 copies/cell representing high-affinity sites and 5,240 copies/cell representing moderate-affinity sites [86]. The plasmid-specified major outer membrane protein TraTp of Escherichia coli is normally present in 21,000 copies/cell at the cell surface [87]. Streptococcus pyogenes (strain 6414) has 11,600 copies/cell of surface binding sites to human collagen [88]; another receptor protein specific to type II collagen (among the dozens of collagen types) are found in 30,000 copies/cell on the surface of each Staphylococcus aureus (strain Cowan 1) cell with equilibrium constant Kd = 10-7 M [89]. (Researchers found that the same bacterial receptor would also specifically respond to synthetic collagenlike analogs containing the peptide sequences (Pro-Gly-Pro)n, (Pro-Pro-Gly)10, and (Pro-OH-Pro-Gly)10 [89].) If the microbivore must distinguish among ~500 different bacterial species or strains, then each bacterial cell type may be uniquely identified using as few as log2(500) ~ 9 binary antigenic markers [1, LINK].

Assuming that nine species-specific bacterial coat ligands are sufficient to uniquely identify an encountered bacterium as belonging to the target species or strain, and that ~104 copies of each of the nine ligands are present on a bacterial surface of area ~10 micron2, then the mean distance between each ligand of the same type is 31.6 nm. A square array of 200 adjacent ligand receptors on the nanorobot surface, with each ligand or receptor active site ~5 nm2 in area (e.g., antibody-antigen complexes typically show contact interfaces of 6-9 nm2, involving 14-21 residues on each side [90-92]), would on average overlap one such ligand that is resident in a bacterial surface pressed against it. If there are 100 such arrays uniformly distributed over the entire nanorobot surface, then a randomly chosen mutual contact area of only 1% of the nanorobot surface suffices to ensure that there is at least one array overlapping a unique ligand on the bacterial surface during a collision. Of course, the probability of binding, even given mutual contact, is not unity, but perhaps only ~10% (e.g., Nencounter ~ 10 [1, LINK]). However, this factor is almost completely offset because there are nine equivalent array sets -- one set for each of the nine unique bacterial ligands -- and recognition and binding of any one of the nine unique ligands will suffice to bind the bacterium securely to the nanorobot.

Since array members need not be adjacent, the actual physical configuration on the microbivore surface is a bit different. The binding sites are modeled after the narrowband chemical sensor described in Nanomedicine [1, LINK], Figure 4.2. Each 33 receptor block consists of nine 7 nm 7 nm receptor sites, one for each of the nine species-specific bacterial coat ligands. There are 20,000 of these 33 receptor blocks distributed uniformly across the microbivore surface. Each 33 receptor block measures 21 nm 21 nm 10 nm. A single receptor, if bound to a ligand, may provide a binding force of 40-160 pN [1, LINK], probably larger than the largest plausible in sanguo dislodgement force of ~100 pN [1, LINK] and thus gripping the bacterium reasonably securely. The recognition event can be consumated in tmeas ~ 30 microsec, according to Eqn. 8.5 from Nanomedicine [1, LINK]. As an operational procedure, once any one of the nine key ligands has been detected, all of the remaining unoccupied receptors for that ligand in other receptor blocks can be deactivated, and so on until all nine ligands have been individually confirmed -- a combination lock whose completion triggers bacteriocide. Interestingly, during phagocytosis by macrophages most injected particles are recognized by more than one receptor; these receptors are capable of cross-talk and synergy, and phagocytic receptors can both activate and inhibit each other's function [247].

Microbial binding is energetically favored; if binding energy is ~240 zJ per microbial ligand [1, LINK] (1 zeptojoule (zJ) = 10-21 J), then the power requirement for debinding a set of 9 occupied receptors in ~100 microsec is only ~0.02 pW.

3.1.2 Telescoping Grapples

Once the target bacterium has been confirmed and temporarily secured to the microbivore surface at >9 points with a minimum binding force of >360-1440 pN, telescoping robotic grapples emerge from silos in the nanodevice surface to establish secure anchorage to the microbe's plasma membrane or outer coat. Each grapple is mechanically equivalent to the telescoping robotic manipulator arm described by Drexler [93], but 2.5 times the length. This manipulator when fully extended is a cylinder 30 nm in diameter and 250 nm in length with a 150-nm diameter work envelope (to the microbivore hull surface), capable of motion up to 1 cm/sec at the tip at a mechanical power cost of ~0.6 pW at moderate load (or ~0.006 pW at 1 mm/sec tip speed), and capable of applying ~1000 pN forces with an elastic deflection of only ~0.1 nm at the tip. (Interestingly, supplementing chemispecificity (Section 3.1.1) gram-negative bacteria can be distinguished from gram-positive organisms by their wavy surface appearance when scanned by AFM [94], a subtle morphological difference that should also be detectable by grapple-based pressure sensors that could help confirm microbial identity.)

Each telescoping grapple is housed beneath a self-cleaning irising cover mechanism that hides a vertical silo measuring 50 nm in diameter and 300 nm in depth, sufficient to accommodate elevator mechanisms needed to raise the grapple to full extension or to lower it into its fully stowed position. At a 1 mm/sec elevator velocity, the transition requires 0.25 millisec at a Stokes drag power cost (operating in human blood plasma) of 0.0008 pW, or 0.008 pW for 10 grapples maximally extended simultaneously [1, LINK]. The elevator mechanism consists of compressed nitrogen gas rotored into or out of the subgrapple chamber volume from a small high-pressure sealed reservoir, a pneumatic piston providing the requisite extension or retraction force. A grapple-distension force of ~100 pN applied for a distance of 250 nm could be provided by 25 atm gas pressure in a minimum subgrapple chamber volume of 104 nm3, involving the importation of ~6000 gas molecules. Removal of these ~6000 gas molecules from a maximum subgrapple chamber volume of 105 nm3 provides a ~1 atm pressure differential and a maximum grapple-retraction force of ~100 pN; cables or other mechanisms may assist in retraction if more force is needed.  The aperture of the irising silo cover can be controlled to continuously match the width of the protruding grapple, greatly reducing the intrusion of foreign biomolecules into the silo.

Each grapple is terminated with a reversible footpad ~20 nm in diameter. In the case of gram-positive bacteria, a footpad may consist of 100 close-packed lipophilic binding sites targeted to plasma membrane surface lipid molecules, providing a secure 1000 pN anchorage between the nanorobot and the bacterium assuming a single-lipid extraction force of ~10 pN [1, LINK]. In the case of gram-negative bacteria, a footpad with binding sites for ~3 murein-linked covalently attached transmembrane protein molecules would provide a secure 120-480 pN anchorage, assuming 40-160 pN/molecule and ~9 such molecules per 1000 nm2 of microbial surface (Section 3.1.1). In either case, undesired adhesions with bacterial slime must be avoided. The footpad tool is rotated into, or out of, an exposed position from behind a protective cowling, using countercoiled internal pull cables.

The tiniest bacterium to be digested may be ~200 nm in diameter (Section 2.1.4), but the smallest virus can be only ~16 nm wide (Section 2.2). Since the work envelopes of adjacent grapples picking particles bound to the hull surface extend 150 nm toward each other from either side, the maximum center-to-center intergrapple separation that permits the ciliary transport of 16 nm objects is ~300 nm. This requires 1 grapple per 0.09 micron2 of nanorobot surface, for a total of 277 grapple silos uniformly distributed over the entire 26.885 micron2 microbivore outer hull, excluding the two 1-micron2 port doors. (One or more grapple-containing bridges across the annular exhaust port aperture (Section 3.1.4) may be necessary if it is desired to transport targets <200 nm in diameter from the circular DC exhaust port island to the main grapple field of the microbivore, allowing subsequent transport to the ingestion port inlet; such bridges are not included in the present design.) During transport, a bacterium of more typical size such as a 0.4 micron 2 micron P. aeruginosa bacillus may be supported by up to 9 grapples simultaneously. A somewhat larger E. coli bacterium would be supported by up to 12 grapples.

After telescoping grapples are securely anchored to the captive bacterium, the receptor blocks are debonded from the microbial surface, leaving the grapples free to maneuver the pathogen as required. Grapple force sensors inform the onboard computer of the captive microbe's footprint size and orientation. The grapples then execute a ciliary transport protocol in which adjacent manipulators move forward and backward countercyclically, alternately binding and releasing the bacterium, with new grapples along the path ahead emerging from their silos as necessary and unused grapples in the path behind being stowed. Manipulator arrays, ciliary arrays (MEMS), and Intelligent Motion Surfaces are related precursor (and currently available) technologies (reviewed in Section 9.3.4 of Nanomedicine [1, LINK]).

Rodlike organisms are first repositioned to align their major axis perpendicular to a great circle plane containing both the device center point and the ingestion port at the front of the device. This keeps the organism traveling over surfaces having the largest possible radius of curvature during transport, thus minimizing any forces necessary to bend the bacterium as it follows the curved microbivore surface. A cylindrical bacterium of length Ltube and bending stiffness ktube is bent by a force F into a circle segment having radius of curvature Rcurve ~ (ktubeLtube2 / 2 F) for small deflections. For the bacillus P. aeruginosa, Ltube ~ 2 microns and tube radius is ~0.2 microns; the elastic modulus is 2.5 107 N/m2 for the 3-nm thick hydrated sacculus [97], giving ktube ~ 4 10-4 N/m using Eqn. 9.50 from Nanomedicine [1, LINK]. To bend the microbe to the semimajor axis of the microbivore (Rcurve = 1.7 microns) requires F ~ 470 pN, or F ~ 800 pN for the semiminor axis (Rcurve = 1 micron), both of which are substantial bending forces in comparison to the nominal single-grapple anchorage force of 100-500 pN/footpad. Thus it is desirable to bend the bacterium as little as possible during transport. Bending forces may be minimized by adjusting grapple lengths to hold the bacillus farther from the microbivore surface near the endpoints of the footprint, and closer to the microbivore surface near the center of the footprint.

Organisms of all shapes are conveyed toward the ingestion port via cyclical ciliary cycling motions. At a transport velocity of 1 mm/sec, a microbe captured at the greatest possible distance from the ingestion port (~3 microns) is moved to the vicinity of the ingestion port in ~3 millisec. The Stokes law energy cost of transporting an E. coli bacterium through blood plasma side-on at 1 mm/sec is 0.01 pW, so transport power is dominated by mechanical losses in the grapples, a total of ~0.06 pW if 10 grapples are operated simultaneously.

Because the ingestion port is slightly recessed into the body of the nanorobot ellipsoid at the equator, the approaching bacterium must be carried around an inlet rim having a considerably smaller radius of curvature than the main body of the microbivore. The inlet rim is essential in this design and provides needed mechanical control from inlet-wall grapples as the microbe is fed into the ingestion port. From simple geometry, if one grapple is fully extended to length L = Lgrap and the adjacent grapple is almost fully retracted to length L ~ 0, then the bacillus can be conveyed around an inlet rim curve of radius Rrim with zero bending if the distance between the adjacent grapples is no more than dmax ~ 2 Rrim sin-1 (Lgrap / 2 Rrim) ~ 0.39 microns, taking Lgrap = 250 nm and Rrim ~ 0.25 microns at the inlet rim. This requires at least 1 grapple per dmax2 ~ 0.15 micron2 of nanorobot surface near the ingestion port, comfortably lower in number density than the 0.09 micron2/grapple elsewhere on the hull. Nevertheless, to ensure full control of the transported object near the ingestion port an additional 23 grapple silos are non-uniformly distributed over the 10% of microbivore surface nearest the ingestion port, sufficient to raise the mean number density to 0.05 micron2/grapple in that region. Thus there are a total of 300 grapple silos embedded in the entire microbivore outer hull, excluding the area covered by the two 1-micron2 port doors.

3.1.3 Ingestion Port and Morcellation Chamber

The ingestion port door is an oval-shaped irising mechanism [1, LINK] with an elliptical aperture measuring 0.8654 microns 1.4712 microns, providing a 1 micron2 aperture when fully open. Assuming 0.5 micron2 of contact surfaces sliding ~1 micron at 1 cm/sec, power dissipation is ~3 pW during the 0.1 millisec door opening or closing time. To allow handing small particles like viruses securely into the ingestion port, the porthole mechanism can be programmed to iris open in an off-center manner if required. For example, if manipulating a small virion particle the hole's center should initiate within 150 nm of a sidemost edge of the port (i.e., within one grapple surface-reach distance, either left or right side); after the growing aperture reaches the edge of the nearest side, it can then continue to dilate toward the edge on the opposite side while retaining its expanding elliptical shape. On the other hand, if a bacterium >~0.632 microns in diameter is being manipulated, the port door may be programmed to iris open from the center. During internalization the port doors perform gentle test-closings, with associated force sensors providing feedback as to the completeness of the internalization process and enabling the microbivore to detect the pinch points of linked bacilli to allow separation at these points, if necessary. In the case of motile bacilli having long flagellar tails, the premature closing of the ingestion port door may sever the tail, casting the immunogenic tail fragment adrift in the blood; this outcome must be avoided (Section 4.3).

Opening the ingestion port door allows entry into the morcellation chamber (MC), a cylindrical chamber 2 microns in length and the same interior elliptical cross-section as the port door, giving a total open volume of 2 micron3 which is large enough to hold one intact microorganism because most sepsis-related bacteria are <2 micron3 in volume (Table 1). Recessed into the MC walls are 10 diamondoid cutting blades (possibly multisegmented), each ~2 micron long, ~0.25 micron wide, and 10 nm thick with a 1 nm cutting edge, giving ~0.050 micron3 of blades (~0.005 micron3/blade). Following the analysis of nano-morcellation systems described elsewhere [1, LINK], to mince material having Young's modulus ~108 N/m2 using one blade at a time (reserving the other 9 blades as replacements or to provide alternative chopping geometries) requires the application of ~100 nN/chop, consuming up to ~100 pW during a process in which the blade reciprocates at 50 Hz and travels at ~60 micron/sec, making 20 cuts in a total mincing time of 400 millisec. (Bacterial walls include a 3-6 nm thick hydrated sacculus [97] and include a cross-linked peptidoglycan (murein) mesh [95-97] with strands spaced ~1.3 nm apart [98].) The resulting morcellate should consist largely of organic chunks ~3-10 nm in diameter [1, LINK]. An intriguing alternative configuration is a diamondoid sieve or dragnet that could be pulled repeatedly through the MC, analogous to pushing the microbe forcibly through a strainer; other possible fragmentation techniques such as sonication appear to require too much onboard acoustic energy to be feasible (e.g., power intensities of ~106 pW/micron2 [1, LINK]).

Although complex mechanical assemblages may dissipate 109 W/m3, mechanomechanical and electromechanical transducers are generally very efficient, dissipating 1012-1016 W/m3 during mechanical energy transmission [1, LINK; 93]. Conservatively assuming that the nanomotors needed to drive the chopping blade may dissipate ~1010 W/m3, then a ~0.01 micron3 drive motor is required to operate the blade; we allocate a total of 0.1 micron3 for multiple drive motors, thus providing tenfold redundancy. Another 0.1 micron3 is allocated for blade housings. A diamondoid MC wall ~10 nm thick (materials volume ~0.073 micron3) allows the MC to withstand internal pressures >1000 atm, far higher than the natural internal microbial pressurization of 3-5 atm [99]. (Bacterial rigidity is regulated by turgor pressure [100].)

Once microbial mincing is complete, the morcellate must be removed to the digestion chamber (Section 3.1.4) using an ejection piston. A 20-nm thick piston pusher plate driven by a 2 micron long, 10 nm thick pusher cable (energized by the chopping blade motor coupled through a mechanical transmission gearbox) comprises ~0.02 micron3 of device volume. This piston moves forward at ~20 microns/sec, applying ~1 atm of pressure to push morcellate of viscosity ~100 kg/m-sec through a 1 micron2 gated annular aperture for a chamber length of 2 microns, emptying the MC in ~100 millisec with a Poiseuille fluid flow power dissipation [1, LINK] of ~2 pW. Interestingly, the energy dissipation rate required to disrupt the plasma membrane of ~95% of all animal cells transported in forced turbulent capillary flows is on the order of 108-109 W/m3 [101], corresponding to a mechanical power input of 100-1000 pW into a 1 micron3 chamber volume. The annular MC/DC interchamber door must be opened before activating the MC ejection piston; its size and power specifications are similar to those of the annular DC exhaust port door (Section

The MC ejection piston also is used initially to draw the microbe into the MC in a controlled manner. By slowly pulling a vacuum after the ingestion port door has opened, the piston can apply ~1 atm of negative pressure over the ~1 micron2 leading surface of the bacterium, or up to ~100 nN of force. The Poiseuille flow of a microorganism of viscosity ~1000 kg/m-sec through a 1 micron2 aperture with a 1 atm pressure differential into a chamber 2 microns in length dissipates 0.2 pW as the bacterium is drawn into the chamber at a speed of 2 microns/sec, thus requiring ~1 second for complete internalization of 2 micron3 of ingesta.

3.1.4 Digestion Chamber and Exhaust Port

The digestion chamber (DC), like the MC, has a total open volume of 2 micron3. The DC is a cylinder of oval cross-section surrounding the MC, measuring roughly 2.0 microns in width, 1.3 microns in height, and 2.0 microns in length, with a mean ~0.5 micron clearance between the DC and MC walls and a materials volume of 0.11 micron3 assuming diamondoid walls ~10 nm thick. Morcellate is pumped from the MC into the DC where a preprogrammed sequence of engineered enzymes are successively injected and extracted, reducing the morcellate primarily to monoresidue amino acids, mononucleotides, free fatty acids and monosaccharides, which are then harmlessly discharged into the environment.

If the morcellate consists of organic chunks ~3-10 nm in diameter (Section 3.1.3), enzymes directed against specific bond types may attack these bonds only if they are exposed on the outermost surface of each chunk. Considering for simplicity only proteinaceous chunks, and given that the average amino acid has a molecular weight of 141.1 daltons and a molecular volume of Vres ~ 0.49 nm3, then a chunk of volume Vchunk may be regarded as having Nlayer successive surface layers where Vchunk ~ Vres (1 + 2Nlayer)3. Taking Vchunk1/3 = 10.2 nm for the largest pieces implies a chunk comprised of 2197 residues and having Nlayer ~ 6 layers that must be processed sequentially, like peeling an onion one skin at a time. Thus the entire enzyme suite must be shuttled in and out of the DC six times, with one "layer" of all chunks being processed during each of the six subcycles. Artificial Enzyme Suite

Artificial digestive enzymes may be designed to attack just one class of chemical bond [102]. For example, the natural serine protease enzyme chymotrypsin only cleaves peptide bonds at the carboxylic ends of residues having large hydrophobic side chains, such as the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine [103, 104]. The proteolytic enzyme trypsin exhibits a different specificity, cleaving peptide bonds on the C-terminal side of the basic residues arginine and lysine [103]. The endopeptidase elastase attacks bonds adjacent to small amino acid residues such as alanine, glycine, and serine [105] and will cleave tri-, tetra-, and penta-peptides of alanine [104]. Enzymes which will cleave the unusual right-handed (D-enantiomeric) amino acids found in bacterial coats, including D-aminopeptidase [106] or D-stereospecific amino-acid amidase [107], D-peptidase and DD-peptidase [107], carboxypeptidase DD [108] and D-amino acid acylase [109] are well-known.

To prevent self-digestion during storage and use, each artificial peptidase is engineered so that the class of residue it is designed to attack is not exposed on its own external physical surface [112] -- that is, each artificial enzyme minimally exhibits strong autolysis resistance [110-116], with an ideal objective of near-zero autolysis. (A few natural enzymes retain full post-autolysis functionality [117].) Another significant design constraint is that natural bacterial enzymes already present in the morcellate (e.g., elastase produced by P. aeruginosa [118]) must have negligible activity against any of the microbivore's artificial enzymes. Since the target microbe's enzyme inventory is known in advance, the microbivore enzyme suite can be tailored to deal with any unusually troublesome bacterial enzymes, and optimal pH in the DC can be actively managed (see below).

Ensuring biological digestive universality while allowing the enzyme engineer sufficient diversity of available protein building blocks requires a minimum of two pre-activated artificial enzymes that attack specific peptide bonds in each of the seven major amino acid classes -- acidic (Asn, Asp, Gln, Glu), aliphatic (Ala, Gly, Ile, Leu, Val), aromatic/hydrophobic (His, Phe, Trp, Tyr), basic (Arg, His, Lys), hydroxylic (Ser, Thr, Tyr), imino (Pro), and sulfur (Cys, Met). The present design thus includes a requirement for 14 artificial endopeptidases, plus 2 broad-spectrum artificial tripeptidase [119] and dipeptidase [120] if needed to complete the digestion of potentially bioactive tripeptides and dipeptides to free amino acids.

Enzymes capable of degrading nucleic acid polymers are classified as deoxyribonucleases (specificity for DNA) or ribonucleases (specifically hydrolyzing RNA), or as exonucleases (hydrolyzing a nucleotide only when present at a strand terminus, moving in only one direction, either 3'5' or 5'3') or endonucleases (cleaving internal phosphodiester bonds to produce either 3'-hydroxyl and 5'-phosphoryl termini or 5'-hydroxyl and 3'-phosphoryl termini) [105]. Some endonucleases can hydrolyze both strands of a double-stranded molecule, others attack only one strand of a double-stranded molecule, while still others cleave only single-stranded molecules. Restriction endonucleases recognize specific DNA sequences -- for example, Hpa I recognizes a specific double-strand 6-base sequence (GTTAAC/CAATTG) and selectively cleaves both strands of the double strand in the middle at the TA/AT bond, producing an unreactive molecular "blunt end" [105]. There are ten distinct dinucleotide bond combinations (AA, AC, AG, AT, CC, CG, CT, GG, GT, and TT), which suggests that 10 artificial endonucleases may suffice, plus 2 general-purpose dinucleases to complete the digestion to mononucleotides, for a total of 12 artificial polynucleotidases.

Additional engineered enzymes (not included in the present design) may be needed to digest bacteriophages that may be resident inside certain bacteria. To avoid digestion by bacterial restriction enzymes, phages often employ unusual molecular substitutions involving 2,6-diaminopurine, 6-methyladenine, 8-azaguanine, 5-hydroxymethyl uracil, 5-methylcytosine, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, and others [121]. For example, B. subtilis phage DNA replaces thymine with hydroxymethyluracil and uracil; S-2L cyanophage replaces adenine by 2-aminoadenine (2,6-diaminopurine); SPO1, SP82G, and Phi-e substitute hydroxymethyl dUTP for dTTP in the phage DNA up to 20%; PBS1 and PBS2 phages substitute uracil for thymine; T-even (T2/T4/T6) phage DNA replaces dCMP by hydroxymethylcytosine which is then further glycosylated, rendering the phage DNA resistant to host restriction; and in phage Mu DNA, a unique glycinamide moiety modifies about 15% of the adenine residues [121]. Given our complete future knowledge of phage genomes and the bacteria they are likely to inhabit, a comprehensive phage digestive strategy can be planned and installed in advance, during microbivore design and construction. This problem is not considered serious in the case of standard antibiotic therapy.

Free adenosine (a mononucleotide) is involved in the regulation of coronary blood flow [122], and certain free nucleotides have been shown to exhibit minor physiological action on lymphocytes [123] and T cells [124] in animal models, so additional nucleotidases, phosphatidases and nucleosidases may be added if necessary to reduce free mononucleotides to phosphoric acid, sugars, and purine/pyrimidine bases prior to discharge from the nanorobot. However, such additional enzymes are not included in the present microbivore design because nucleotidase is naturally present in normal human serum [125-129] and at elevated serum levels in many disease conditions [129-133].

Microbial lipids may be digested by analogs of pancreatic lipase (e.g., steapsin) or lipoprotein lipase which hydrolyze polyacylglycerols (mostly glycosyl diacylglycerols in bacteria) containing fatty acid chains into free fatty acids and glycerol, by cholesterol esterase that hydrolyzes cholesteryl esters into free cholesterol (although cholesterol and other sterols are relatively rare in microorganisms [134-136]), by phospholipase that attacks phospholipids producing glycerol, fatty acids, phosphoric acid, and perhaps choline [105], or by sphingolipidases [137] or ceramidases [138] that hydrolyze the sphingolipids found in some bacteria, resulting in mostly glycerol and saturated (in bacteria) free fatty acids in the final digesta. Acyloxyacyl hydrolase removes the secondary (acyloxyacyl-linked) fatty acyl chains from the lipid A region of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS endotoxin), thereby detoxifying the molecules [139]. The present microbivore design assumes a requirement for 5 artificial lipases.

Microbial carbohydrates may be digested by an amylase that hydrolyzes starch and glycogen, and by a selection of oligosaccharidases (e.g., maltase, sucrase-isomaltase) and disaccharidases or saccharases (e.g., lactase, invertase, sucrase, trehalase) to complete the digestion to monosaccharides [105]. (Lactase also has a second active site for splitting glycosylceramides [105].) The present design assumes a requirement for 4 artificial carbohydrases in the microbivore enzyme suite.

Finally, simple anions or cations may be required for pH management of the morcellate, and 25% of all enzymes contain tightly bound metal ions or require them for activity [105], most commonly Mg++, Mn++, Ca++, or K+; certain low-bioavailability but essential cofactors such as iron and copper might also need to be actively managed. It might also be necessary in some cases to inject and extract small quantities of superoxide dismutase, catalase and chelating agents such as metallothionein, ferritin, or transferrin to control potentially damaging concentrations of superoxides and metals in the morcellate, or small quantities of other specialized enzymes analogous to heme oxygenase, biliverdin reductase and beta-glucuronidases to digest bacterial porphyrins [244], enzymes [245] to cleave bacterial rhodopsins, and so forth, but a full analysis of these factors is beyond the scope of this paper. The present design assumes a requirement for 3 additional chemical species of this type, to be manipulated simultaneously with the artificial enzymes as previously described.

Full digestion of the morcellate, constituting one complete digestion cycle, is thus presumed to require six subcycles of activity, with each subcycle involving the serial injection and extraction of 40 different enzymes or enzyme-related molecules (i.e., 40 sub-subcycles per subcycle), one after the other, for a total of 240 enzyme sub-subcycles. Interestingly, intracellular lysosomes are known to contain ~40 digestive enzymes capable of degrading all major classes of biological macromolecules -- including at least 5 phosphatases, 4 proteases, 2 nucleases, 6 lipases, 12 glycosidases, and an arylsulfatase [140, 141]. Digestion Cycle Time

The duration of each enzyme sub-subcycle depends primarily upon two factors: (1) the speed of enzymatic action (Section, which may differ somewhat for each enzyme and each substrate, and (2) the speed at which enzymatic molecules can be rotored into and out of the DC (Section Speed of Enzymatic Action

If enzyme molecules are plentiful and substrate molecules are rare (typically 1%-100% of the enzymes), the most appropriate measure of enzymatic speed is the enzymatic efficiency (kcat / Km) = 1.5-28 107 molecules of substrate converted to product per second, per molar concentration of enzyme, for a wide variety of enzymes [142]. Here, the Michaelis constant Km is the substrate concentration that produces the half-maximal reaction rate, and kcat is the reaction rate in product molecules generated per unit time per enzyme molecule.

However, for most of the digestion cycle the DC environment consists of a relatively small number of temporarily resident enzyme molecules floating in a sea of plentiful substrate. Zubay [142] notes that in this situation, the speed of enzymatic action is considerably slower and kcat, also known as the enzyme turnover number, is the most relevant measure of enzyme catalytic activity.  Table 3 shows that for peptidases, kcat ranges from ~10-1 sec-1 to ~105 sec-1, while for other enzymes the range is even wider, from ~10-1 sec-1 to ~108 sec-1. In the present scaling study, the mean kcat for all artificial engineered enzymes used in the microbivore enzyme suite, measured against representative substrates, is taken as a midrange value (for all enzymes) of ~104 sec-1 at physiological temperatures (~37C).


Table 3. Values of Enzyme Turnover Number (kcat) for Various Enzymes on Representative Substrates 
Enzyme kcat (sec-1) Reference
   Aminopeptidase PC 0.19 143
   Granulocyte elastase 6 144
   b-fibrinogenase 44 145
  Arginine ester hydrolase 91 146
  Chymotrypsin 100 142
   Lugworm protease 110 147
   Neutral endopeptidase 120 148
   Carboxypeptidase A 141 149
   Entamoeba endopeptidase 172 150
   b-lactamase 210 151
   Astacus protease 380 152
   Carboxypeptidase 3 490 153
   Dipeptidyl peptidase IV 814 120
   Neutral proteinase 1,200 148
   Aminopeptidase A 1,400 154
   Penicillinase 2,000 142
   Proline iminopeptidase 135,000 155
Other Enzymes:
   Lysozyme 0.5 142
   DNA polymerase I 15 142
   a-amylase 140 156
   A. ficuum acid phosphatase 260 157
   Serratia wild-type nuclease 980 158
   Lactate dehydrogenase 1,000 142
   P. aeruginosa lipase 3,000 159
   Staphylococcal nuclease 3,880 160
   Acetylcholinesterase 12,500 161
   Acetylcholinesterase 14,000 142
   Carbonic anhydrase IV 170,000 162
   Carbonic anhydrase 1,000,000 142
   Catalase 40,000,000 142


To estimate the time required for each enzymatic sub-subcycle, for simplicity the initial morcellate of volume Vmorc ~ 2 micron3 is assumed to consist mostly of water containing a volume fraction fprot ~ 0.30 (30%) of now-minced protein. The specific volume of the average amino acid residue is taken as Vres ~ 0.49 nm3/residue and the required number of enzymatic sub-subcycles is taken as Nessc ~ 240. Then the average number of peptide bond scissions per sub-subcycle is Nbondx = (Vmorc fprot) / (VresNessc) ~ 5 106 bonds/sub-subcycle, and the processing time per sub-subcycle is tenz ~ Nbondx / (kcatnenz) where nenz is the number of enzyme molecules injected into the morcellate during each sub-subcycle. Taking nenz = 104 enzyme molecules and kcat = 104 sec-1, then tenz ~ 50 millisec/sub-subcycle.

Note that the diffusion time required by an enzyme molecule of radius 3.47 nm at 37C in a plasma-like fluid of viscosity ~10-3 kg/m-sec (for molecular diffusion) to achieve an RMS displacement equivalent to the ~0.5 micron clearance between the DC and MC chamber walls is ~2 millisec (<< tenz), according to Eqn. 3.1 from Nanomedicine [1, LINK], so the enzyme action during each sub-subcycle is not seriously diffusion-limited. (The diffusion constant for a ~72 kDa fusion protein in unmorcellated intact E. coli cytoplasm is ~7.7 10-12 m2/sec [163], giving a diffusion time across 0.5 microns of ~16 millisec, according to Eqn. 9.80 from Nanomedicine [1, LINK].) Speed of Enzyme-Transport Rotors

If nenz enzyme molecules must be transferred during each sub-subcycle in a transport time ttransport using nrotor molecular sorting rotors with each rotor operating at a constant transport rate of krotor molecules/rotor-sec, then nrotor = nenz / (ttransportkrotor). Each artificial enzyme molecule is assumed to consist of ~350 residues with a molecular weight of ~50 kDa and a molecular volume of ~175 nm3, giving a molecular diameter of ~6.9 nm if assumed spherical. Taking the excluded volume per enzyme molecule binding site as 7 nm in diameter, a sorting rotor 8 nm thick with 10 receptors plus one 8-nm blank space per rotor requires an enzyme-transport rotor circumference of 78 nm, giving a rotor diameter of 25 nm and a rectangular face area and volume per rotor of ~200 nm2 and ~5000 nm3, respectively [1, LINK; 93].

What is the value of krotor during enzyme extraction? The injection of 104 enzyme molecules into the 2 micron3 digestion chamber produces an enzyme concentration of ~10-5 M (~5 10-6 molecules/nm3), giving an initial rotor rate kr(1) ~ 10,000 molecules/rotor-sec for the first enzyme molecule that is extracted from the DC by a rotor; kr(2) ~ 9,999 molecules/rotor-sec for the second molecule extracted; and so forth. At the end of enzyme extraction, the last enzyme molecule present in the DC represents a concentration of ~10-9 M (~5 10-10 molecules/nm3), giving a final rotor rate kr(10,000 = nenz) ~ 1 molecule/rotor-sec for the last enzyme molecule that is extracted from the DC by a rotor. The first molecule to be extracted takes (1/kr(1)) = 100 microsec for one rotor to extract, whereas the last molecule to be extracted takes (1/kr(10,000 = nenz)) = 1 sec for a rotor to extract. For the entire extraction process, the average number of rotor-sec per molecule required to empty the DC of nenz enzyme molecules approximates the sum of the harmonic series (1/kr(1)) + (1/kr(2)) + ... + (1/kr(nenz)) divided by the number of molecules, or krotor-1 ~ (gamma + ln(nenz)) / nenz = 0.978756 10-3 rotor-sec/molecule, where Euler's constant gamma ~ 0.577215... and nenz >> 1. Hence the net transport rate for all nenz molecules is krotor ~ nenz / (gamma + ln(nenz)) ~ 103 molecules/rotor-sec for nenz = 104 enzyme molecules, and taking textract = 50 millisec, then nrotor = nenz / (textractkrotor) = 200 rotors.

However, increasing nrotor to 2000 rotors to provide tenfold redundancy, while holding textract constant, reduces the required krotor by a factor of 10 -- e.g., to kr(10,000) ~ 0.1 molecule/rotor-sec. According to Section 3.2.2 of Nanomedicine [1, LINK], the diffusion current to a rotor of face area 200 nm2 (equivalent circular radius ~8 nm), taking the enzyme diffusion coefficient as ~7 10-11 m2/sec at 37C, is ~2 molecules/sec when the enzyme concentration is 10-9 M at the rotor/digesta interface as the last enzyme molecule is being extracted. This is now more than an order of magnitude larger than the kr(10,000) ~ 0.1 molecule/rotor-sec requirement, so enzyme rotors are operating well within the diffusion limit for these devices. After extraction of all enzymes, the rotors for that enzyme are stowed with the rotor blank space exposed, thus protecting stored enzymes from contact with a potentially degradative intrachamber environment.

Increasing nrotor to 2000 rotors per enzyme species also permits the elimination of enzyme storage tanks and associated support structures, because 2 104 enzyme molecules can be stored in 2000 rotors each having 10 enzyme receptor sites per rotor. If the rotors are turned at 1 kHz, the entire enzyme inventory is injected into the DC in ~1 rotor rotation time, giving tinject ~ 1 millisec. Summary of Digestion Systems

During each sub-subcycle, 104 enzyme molecules are injected into the digestion chamber in tinject ~ 1 millisec (Section Enzymatic digestive action then commences, requiring tenz ~ 50 millisec to go to completion (Section The 104 enzyme molecules are then extracted from the DC and returned to the in-rotor reservoir in textract ~ 50 millisec (Section Total processing time per sub-subcycle is tssc ~ 101 millisec, so one complete microbivore digestion cycle comprising 240 sub-subcycles requires ~24.24 sec.

There is one set of 2000 enzyme-transport rotors for each of the 40 enzyme species transported, hence there are 80,000 enzyme-transport rotors protruding into the DC. These rotors have a total face area of 16 micron2, somewhat more than the ~10 micron2 cylindrical DC sidewall area, thus require some slight rotor invagination into the DC volume. The rotors occupy a total onboard volume of 0.4 micron3 with an additional 0.1 micron3 allocated for drive mechanisms, housings, and other rotor-related support, for a total 0.5 micron3 enzyme-transport rotor volume allocation. If the binding energy of each enzyme receptor is ~240 zJ [1, LINK], then the total energy cost to eject 104 enzyme molecules from their rotors is ~0.0024 pJ, representing a mean power requirement of 2.4 pW when injection is performed over tinject ~ 1 millisec. Rotor drag power during extraction is negligible, so full-cycle power consumption averages ~0.024 pW.

Note that bond hydrolysis is often thermodynamically favored, evolving a free energy of hydrolysis Ehydrol ~ -4 zJ/bond to -14 zJ/bond for breaking peptide bonds [164, 165], -21 zJ/bond to -46 zJ/bond for glycosides and sugars [165], and -15 zJ/bond to -103 zJ/bond for various organophosphate bonds [165, 166]. Hence the scission of Nbondx ~ 5 106 bonds/sub-subcycle during a time tssc ~ 101 millisec/sub-subcycle produces a continuous digestive waste heat of Pdigest = EhydrolNbondx / tssc~ 0.2-5 pW per nanorobot, but most likely <1 pW for typical microbial compositions.

It is well-known that protein components of the cell membrane are continually removed and replaced, with the turnover rate in the unprotected cellular environment varying for different proteins but averaging a half-life of ~200,000 sec or ~ 2 days [140, 141]. However, each enzyme spends a total time of 0.306 sec per digestion cycle (Table 6) exposed to the morcellate or intermediate digesta, which suggests useful enzyme suite lifetimes of at least 104-105 digestion cycles (e.g., mission lifetimes >3-30 days assuming continuous digestive activity) conservatively may be expected. In typical clinical deployments to combat acute bacteremia, each microbivore will experience at most 1-10 digestion cycles during the entire mission. Additionally, artificial enzymes that are deployed in relatively nondegradative controlled intrananorobotic environments might be expected to survive perhaps an order of magnitude longer than natural enzymes in the wild. This increased survivability, coupled with the tenfold redundancy of all critical onboard systems including the artificial enzymes and their transport mechanisms, suggests that extended microbivore missions lasting many months in duration might be feasible. Ejection Piston and Exhaust Port

Once microbial digestion is complete, the digesta must be discharged into the external environment of the nanorobot. Egestion is achieved using an annular-shaped ejection piston comprised of a 20-nm thick piston pusher plate driven by at least two 2-micron long, 10-nm thick pusher cables, comprising ~0.02 micron3 of device volume. This piston moves forward at ~200 micron/sec, applying ~0.1 atm of pressure to push digesta of viscosity <1 kg/m-sec through a 1 micron2 gated annular exhaust port, through a distance of the 2-micron DC length, emptying the DC in ~10 millisec with a Poiseuille fluid flow power dissipation [1, LINK] of ~2 pW. Afterwards, the piston is retracted, effectively pulling a vacuum in the DC in preparation to receive the next batch of morcellate from the MC.

An annular exhaust port door must be opened prior to activation of the ejection piston to allow the digesta to escape. The exhaust port door is an oval-shaped irising mechanism [1, LINK] with an annular elliptical aperture measuring 0.721 microns 1.227 microns along the inside curve and 1.108 microns 1.884 microns along the outside curve in vertical plane projection, providing a 1.161 micron2 aperture in the hull surface when fully open. Assuming 0.5 micron2 of contact surfaces sliding ~1 micron at 1 cm/sec, power dissipation is ~3 pW during the 0.1 millisec door opening or closing time.

3.2 Microbivore Support Systems

Various mechanical subsystems are required to support the principal activities of the microbivore digestive system. These support subsystems include the power supply (Section 3.2.1), external and internal sensors (Section 3.2.2), the onboard computer (Section 3.2.3), structural support (Section 3.2.4), and a ballast system to permit nanapheresis (Section 3.2.5).

3.2.1 Power Supply and Fuel Buffer Tankage

The microbivore is scaled for a maximum power output of 200 pW. The power source is assumed to be an efficient oxyglucose powerplant such as a fuel cell, with net output power density of ~109 W/m3 [1, LINK]. Each powerplant thus requires an onboard volume of 0.2 micron3. Ten powerplants (each one independently capable of powering the entire nanorobot at its maximum power requirement) are included onboard for redundancy, giving a total powerplant volume requirement of 2 micron3.

The microbivore is initially charged with glucose and compressed oxygen (stored in sapphire-walled tankage), and thereafter absorbs its ongoing requirements directly from the bloodstream. Assuming 50% energy conversion efficiency and a 200 pW continuous power production requirement, each glucose and oxygen molecule that are consumed produce 2382.5 zJ or 397.1 zJ, respectively [1, LINK], indicating a peak burn rate of 8.4 107 molecules/sec of glucose and 50 107 molecules/sec of O2.

The minimum glucose concentration in normal adult human blood is 2.3 10-3 molecules/nm3 [1, LINK]. From Eqns. 3.4 and 4.7 in Nanomedicine [1], the required glucose current may be supplied by 13 receptor sites on the device surface at the diffusion limit, assuming device radius ~1 micron and receptor radius ~1 nm. However, at the minimum bloodstream concentration a conventional molecular sorting rotor transports ~106 molecules/rotor-sec, so a minimum of 84 rotors are required to provide the required maximum flow. The present design employs 100 glucose rotors for each of the ten independent powerplants. A small number of glucose rotors could also be positioned for uptake inside the digestion chamber, allowing the scavenging of any microbe-derived glucose before the digesta is expelled; however, this facility is not included in the current design.

The minimum free molecular oxygen concentration in normal adult human blood is 3.0 10-5 molecules/nm3 in venous blood and 7.3 10-5 molecules/nm3 in arterial blood [1, LINK]. From Eqns. 3.4 and 4.7 in Nanomedicine [1], the required oxygen current may be supplied at the diffusion limit by ~1200 receptor sites on the device surface, while in arterial blood; by ~2000 receptor sites assuming an average 50%/50% arterial/venous environment during one complete circulation; or by ~6200 receptor sites in venous blood alone. However, at blood plasma oxygen concentrations a conventional molecular sorting rotor transports ~105 molecules/rotor-sec, so a minimum of ~5000 rotors are required to provide the required maximum flow. The present design employs 7500 oxygen rotors for each of the ten independent powerplants, thus retaining full tenfold redundancy throughout.

Waste products from oxyglucose power generation include water and carbon dioxide. There are 50 107 molecules/sec of each waste species produced, which may be ejected from the nanorobot using 500 standard sorting rotors for each species, assuming a transport rate of ~106 molecules/rotor-sec. The present design thus employs 500 rotors each for H2O and for CO2, for each of the ten independent powerplants. However, in an emergency these wastes could alternatively be bulk-vented to the external environment without harmful effect -- the effervescence limit for point releases of bulk CO2 in arterial plasma is ~70 107 molecules/sec [1, LINK].

The microbivore design thus includes 86,000 small-molecule sorting rotors for energy-molecule transport with full tenfold redundancy, occupying a total of ~8.6 micron2 of microbivore surface area and 0.103 micron3 of microbivore volume. Energy dissipation by the rotor system, if operated at the maximum 200 pW production rate, is 16 pW assuming the transfer of 158.4 107 molecules/sec at an energy cost of ~10 zJ/molecule (net energy cost after compression energy recovery) [1, LINK]. On the microbivore surface, the energy-molecule transport rotors are arranged as compactly as possible into ten lune-shaped sectors (one for each of the ten powerplants) running from front to back (i.e., from ingestion port to exhaust port), with 8600 rotors/lune.

Onboard oxyglucose fuel tanks are scaled to provide a buffer supply of ~one-half circulation time or one digestion cycle time (~30 sec) of peak device energy requirement. Assuming a 50% aqueous solution of glucose in the glucose storage tank and a molecular volume of 0.191 nm3/molecule for glucose molecules [1, LINK], then the required glucose tank volume is 0.962 micron3 to hold a buffer supply of 252 107 molecules of glucose fuel. Adding ~0.038 micron3 for 5-nm thick diamondoid walls and other support structure gives a 1.0 micron3 microbivore volume requirement for the glucose buffer tank. Assuming oxygen storage at 1000 atm (0.0791 nm3/molecule [1, LINK]), the 30-sec buffer supply of 1500 107 oxygen molecules at 200 pW peak powerplant output requires an oxygen tank of volume 1.187 micron3. A spherical pressure tank requires a diamondoid wall thickness of >3.3 nm to avoid bursting; the present design assumes 10 nm thick tank walls. Adding ~0.055 micron3 for tank material volume and 0.058 micron3 for other support structure gives a 1.3 micron3 microbivore volume requirement for the oxygen buffer tank.

Diamondoid mechanical cables may transmit internal mechanical energy at power densities of ~6 1012 W/m3 [1, LINK]. Therefore a single cable that can transmit the entire microbivore power output of 200 pW may have a volume of ~3 10-5 micron3, or ~5 10-5 micron3 including sheathing. To connect every powerplant with each of its 9 neighbors via power cables, permitting rapid load sharing among any pair of powerplants inside the device, requires 45 power cables; assuming 1000 internal power cables to accommodate additional power distribution tasks and for redundancy, total power cable volume is 0.05 micron3. By varying the cable rotation rate, the same power cables can simultaneously be used to convey necessary internal operational information including sensor data traffic and control signals from the computers.

3.2.2 Sensors

The microbivore needs a variety of external and internal sensors to complete its tasks. External sensors include chemical sensors for glucose, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and so forth, up to 10 different molecular species with 100 sensors per molecular species. Each 10 nm 45 nm 45 nm chemical concentration sensor with 450 nm2 face area is assumed to discriminate concentration differentials of ~10% and displace ~105 nm3 of internal nanorobot volume [1, LINK]. Taking chemical sensor energy cost as ~10 zJ/count [1, LINK] with ~104 counts/reading [1, LINK], then 10 readings/sec by each of 1000 microbivore sensors gives a maximum sensor power requirement of ~1 pW by a chemical sensor facility that displaces a total of ~0.1 micron3 of device volume and 0.45 micron2 of device surface area.

Acoustic communication sensors mounted within the nanorobot hull permit the microbivore to receive external instructions from the attending physician during the course of in vivo activities. Assuming (21 nm)3 pressure transducers [2, LINK], then 1000 of these transducers displace ~0.01 micron3 of device volume and 0.44 micron2 of device surface area, producing a small net power input to the device of ~10-4 pW when driven by continuous 0.1-atm pulses [2, LINK].

An internal temperature sensor capable of detecting 0.3C temperature change [1, LINK] may have a volume of (~46 nm)3 ~ 10-4 micron3; positioning ten such sensors near each of the 10 independent powerplants for redundancy implies a total internal temperature sensor volume of ~0.01 micron3. An additional 0.03 micron3 of unspecified internal sensors are included in the microbivore design, bringing the total for all sensors to 0.15 micron3.

3.2.3 Onboard Computers

Starting with Drexler's benchmark (400 nm)3 gigaflop mechanical nanocomputer [93], the microbivore computer is scaled as a 0.01 micron3 device in principle capable of >100 megaflops but normally operated at <~1 megaflop to hold power consumption to <~60 pW. Assuming ~5 bits/nm3 for nanomechanical data storage systems [93] and a read/write cost of ~10 zJ/bit at a read/write speed of ~109 bits/sec [1, LINK; 93], then 5 megabits of mass memory to hold the microbivore control system (Table 4) displaces a volume of 0.001 micron3 and draws ~10 pW while in continuous operation. The current microbivore design includes ten duplicate computer/memory systems for redundancy (with only one of the ten computer/memory systems in active operation at a time), displacing a total of 0.11 micron3 and consuming <~70 pW.


Table 4. Lines of Compactly-Written Low-Error Software Code Required to Control Complex Semiautonomous Machines
Control Software for Device: Lines of Code Estimated Bits of Code (~100 bits/line) Ref.
Voyager spacecraft software 3,000 300,000 167
Viking Lander software ---- 432,000 168
Respirocyte Control System (est.) ---- ~500,000 2
Galileo spacecraft software 8,000 800,000 167
Cassini spacecraft software 32,000 3,200,000 167
Microbivore Control System (est.) ---- ~5,000,000 ---
Ariane flight control software 90,000 9,000,000 169
Airbus 340 Flight Warning Sys. 100,000 10,000,000 170
Mars Pathfinder spacecraft 160,000 16,000,000 167
Space Shuttle software 500,000 50,000,000 171
Boeing 777 and Airbus 340 3,000,000 300,000,000 172



3.2.4 Structural Support

The external microbivore hull is taken as a 50-nm thick diamondoid surface of surface area 24.885 micron2 (again excluding the 2 micron2 of ports), a materials volume of 1.2443 micron3. The buckling pressure of a circular diamondoid cylinder of similar dimensions, subjected to crushing forces, is ~300 atm. However, an ellipsoidal hull is considerably weaker than a circular hull so some internal cross-bracing (not included in the present design) might be necessary to resist the ~50 atm force of dental grinding [1, LINK; 2, LINK].

An additional 0.3799 micron3 of unspecified mechanisms and support structure are included in the present design, which is summarized in Table 5.


Table 5. Microbivore Baseline Design: External Surface Area, Internal Volume, and Maximum Power Allocations 
Microbivore Subsystem Nanorobot Hull
Area Allocation 
Internal Volume
Power Draw
Reversible Microbobial Binding Sites
  20,000 Receptor Blocks 8.82 0.0882 0.02
Telescoping Grapples
  300 Grapple Arms in Silos 0.589 0.177 180
Ingestion Port
  Ingestion Port Door 1.0 0.01 3
  Port Inlet Excluded Volume ---- 0.5 ----
Morcellation Chamber
  Morcellation Chamber Cylinder ---- 2.0 ----
  Morcellation Chamber Walls ---- 0.073 ----
  10 MC Chopping Blades ---- 0.05 100
  MC Chopping Blade Housings ---- 0.1 ----
  10 MC Blade Drive Motors ---- 0.1 ----
  MC Ejection Piston ---- 0.02 2
  MC/DC Interchamber Door ---- 0.01 3
Digestion Chamber/Exhaust Port
  Digestion Chamber Cylinder ---- 2.0 ----
  Digestion Chamber Walls ---- 0.11 ----
  80,000 Enzyme-Transp. Rotors ---- 0.5 2.4
  Annular DC Ejection Piston ---- 0.02 2
  Annular DC Exhaust Port Door 1.161 0.01 3
  Waste heat of hydrolysis ---- ---- ( <5 )
Power Supply and Buffer Storage
  10 Powerplants ---- 2.0 ----
  Power Distribution Cables ---- 0.05 ----
  1000 Glucose Import Rotors 0.1 0.0012 0.84
  75,000 Oxygen Import Rotors 7.5 0.09 5
  10,000 Exhaust Export Rotors 1.0 0.012 10
  Glucose Buffer Storage Tank ---- 1.0 ----
  Oxygen Buffer Storage Tank ---- 1.3 ----
  External sensors 0.45 0.1 1
  Acoustic sensors 0.44 0.01 ----
  Internal sensors ---- 0.04 0.4
  Computer and Memory Storage ---- 0.11 < 70
Structural Support
  External Microbivore Hull ---- 1.2443 ----
  Unspecified Other Structure 5.825 0.3799 ----

TOTALS 26.885 12.1056 < 382.66
  Microbivore dry mass  12.2 pg    
  Microbivore wet mass  17.0 pg    

* Not all systems are operated at peak power requirement simultaneously; normal power usage is typically 50-150 pW.



3.2.5 Ballasting for Nanapheresis

As in previous designs [2, LINK], the microbivore can alter its overall density to achieve approximately neutral buoyancy, thus allowing convenient removal from the patient's body via nanapheresis [1, LINK] after the therapeutic purpose is complete. (More elegant methods for nanorobot ingress and egress from the human body are readily imagined but are beyond the scope of this scaling design study.) Density is altered by exhausting the onboard O2 buffer tank and then pistoning the MC and DC empty, thus establishing a vacuum in both chambers. If either or both of the pistons have failed, the device can still be prepared for nanapheresis by venting the compressed oxygen into the MC and DC, blowing the two chambers clear of fluid and filling this volume with gas, which is substantially similar in density to vacuum from the standpoint of ballasting.

Assuming a mean density of 1900 kg/m3 for diamondoid nanomechanical structure, the "dry weight" of a microbivore is ~12.2 pg, giving a minimum achievable density of ~1000 kg/m3. The density of a fully charged microbivore with both chambers loaded is ~17.0 pg, a net density of ~1400 kg/m3. The mean atomic weight per atom in simple nanomechanical system designs available in 2001 [192, LINK] ranged from 7.5-18.8 daltons/atom of structure, with an average of 12 daltons/atom; taking the average figure, the microbivore consists of 610 billion structural or permanent atoms, plus ~15 billion molecules of oxygen when fully charged at 1000 atm and 135 billion molecules of water (solvating 2.52 billion glucose molecules) with both chambers flooded.

4. Microbivore Performance and Applications

This Section discusses the phagocytic activity of microbivores (Section 4.1), the pharmacokinetics of microbivores (Section 4.2), microbivore biocompatibility (Section 4.3), and various alternative applications for microbivores (Section 4.4).

4.1 Phagocytic Activity of Microbivores

Table 6 shows the approximate timeline for microbivore phagocytic activity during a single, complete microbe digestion cycle. One microbivore can completely digest one microbe that is up to ~2 microns3 in volume -- such as a P. aeruginosa bacterium -- in a time tdigest ~ 30 seconds. This is comparable to the 30-sec P. aeruginosa killing time of the chlorine dioxide/ammonia-based industrial chemical sterilant Cryocide [173] or the chemical germicide hydrogen peroxide [174], except that the microbivore also provides complete digestion of the pathogen. (Intravenous LD50 of H2O2 in rats is 21 mg/kg [175].) Larger microbes that are ~2-4 micron3 in volume could be completely internalized in ~2.5 seconds by taking two quick "bites," although full digestion requires two complete cycles or ~60 seconds, and still larger microbes could be ingested and digested piecemeal at a continuous rate of ~4 micron3/nanorobot-min, provided that some means can be found to avoid toxemia by ensuring that the watertight seal of a partially fragmented organism grappled against the nanorobot is maintained (possibly using flexible lipophilic flaps or metamorphic bumpers [1, LINK]). (Fungi are larger than bacteria but replicate more slowly and are less biotoxic, so the body's tolerance for material leakage during piecemeal ingestion of these organisms should be greater.) The microbivore consumes energy at a maximum rate of 200 pW, but more typically operates at ~100 pW.


Table 6. Microbivore Processing Timeline for a Single
0.4 micron 2 micron Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacterium 
Completion of Event: Time Required to Complete Elapsed Time (millisec)
Microbe Approaches the Nanorobot ----      0
Microbial Recognition and Binding
0.030 msec
Extend Grapples
0.25   msec
Microbial Debinding from Receptors
0.100 msec
Transport Microbe to Ingestion Port
3        msec
Open Ingestion Port Door
0.1    msec
Microbe Internalization into MC
1000        msec
Close Ingestion Port Door
0.1    msec
Mince the Microbe in MC
400       msec
Open MC/DC Interchamber Door
0.1    msec
Activate MC Ejection piston
100       msec
Close MC/DC Interchamber Door
0.1    msec
Digest Microbe in DC:
Enzyme Injection 
Enzyme Digestion 
Enzyme Extraction

240 sub-subcycles (ssc)

  1 msec/ssc
50 msec/ssc
50 msec/ssc

101 msec/ssc
= 24,240        msec
Open Annular DC Exhaust Port Door
0.1    msec
Activate DC Ejection piston
10       msec
Close Annular DC Exhaust Port Door
0.1    msec

Natural phagocytic cells are 100-1000 times larger in volume than microbivores but may consume almost as much power during comparable activities. For example, heat production rises from 9 pW in unstimulated human neutrophils up to 28 pW during phagocytosis, with the rise proportional to the number of particles ingested [176]. The basal rate for resting ~400 micron3 T-cell lymphocytes is ~20 pW, rising to ~65 pW during antigen response [177, 178].

Microbe ingestion times for natural professional phagocytes can be quite rapid, although complete digestion and excretion of the target pathogen may require hours. For example, 13.8-micron diameter murine bone-marrow macrophages have been observed ingesting a 15 micron particle in 30 minutes [179], whereas an ~8-micron lymphocyte was ingested by a macrophage in only 3 minutes with dramatic shape changes, including formation of a pseudopod 155 microns in length [180]. Nevertheless, while macrophages can ingest up to ~25% of their volume per hour [105], microbivores can process ~2000% of their volume per hour, thus are about 80 times more efficient as phagocytic agents, in terms of volume/sec digested per unit volume of phagocytic agent.

Natural professional phagocytic cells such as neutrophils also have a maximum capacity for phagocytosis during their short lifetime, typically a few hours in blood or a few days in tissue. In one experiment [181], 1-100 S. aureus or S. faecalis bacteria were presented to each neutrophil (PMN), which digested more of them at the higher concentrations. At the highest concentration (100:1), PMNs from normal patients could only kill a mean of 9 S. aureus bacteria per PMN, while PMNs from carriers of of chronic granulomatous disease could kill a mean of 14 S. faecalis bacteria per PMN. By comparison, a single microbivore completely digests ~3000 microbes/day of P. aeruginosa bacteria with no well-defined maximum lifetime capacity for phagocytosis.

4.2 Microbivore Pharmacokinetics

To crudely quantify the activity of a specific dose size of microbivores, a simple model of microbe-microbivore interaction may be constructed as follows.

Consider a population of microbivores of spherical-equivalent radius RMV and number density nMV (nanorobots/m3), and a second population of microbes of spherical-equivalent radius Rbug and number density nbug (microbes/m3), simultaneously present in a fluid compartment of volume Vfluid, temperature Tfluid, and viscosity efluid. There are NMV = (nMVVfluid) microbivores and Nbug = (nbugVfluid) microbes initially present in the fluid compartment.

After some incremental thermal diffusion time Dt each microbe migrates one diameter away from its previous position in the fluid. Any microbivore that is entirely present within a radius of (Rbug + 2RMV) of the center of the microbe's new position will be in collision with the microbe, hence the probability of collision is pcoll ~ (4/3) p nMV (Rbug + 2RMV)3 and the half-life for microbe-microbivore collision is t = Dt ln() / ln(1-pcoll) where Dt = 12 p efluidRbug3 / kT for an RMS displacement of one microbial diameter [1, LINK]. The half-life for microbe removal is therefore thalf = tNcoll, where Ncoll is the number of microbe-microbivore collisions required to ensure adhesion and capture. That is, after a time thalf has elapsed, the fixed population of microbivores has eliminated half of the original population of target microbes. This formulation assumes the usual therapeutic situation wherein a large surplus of nanorobots is present relative to the target microbes (NMV >> Nbug), in which case each microbivore only rarely consumes more than a single microbe during the therapeutic mission time tmission. This formulation allows us to ignore the microbivore phagocytic time tdigest ~ 30 sec (Section 4.1) as long as tmission > tdigest.

However, microbes are not entirely passive targets for nanorobotic digestion. After one microbial replication time trepl has elapsed, all extant microbes produce a single daughter microbe, doubling the surviving population of microbes. The fastest known bacterial replicators have a mean generation time of 900-1200 sec [182, 183]. In one experiment, E. coli and P. aeruginosa replicating in the peritoneal cavities of mice having normal host clearance mechanisms displayed generation times of 33 min (1980 sec) and 20 min (1200 sec), respectively, during the first stages of infection [184]; in another experiment P. aeruginosa had a doubling time of 30-32 min (1800-1920 sec) while replicating in normal mouse lung but only 16 min (960 sec) in granulocytopenic (immune-compromised) mice [185]. (Enterobacteria such as E. coli divide only once every 12-24 hours when in the human colon (i.e., trepl = 43,200-86,400 sec) [186], far slower than the optimal laboratory batch rate of trepl ~ 1000 sec.)

Using these relations and taking RMV = 1.42 microns, Rbug = 0.4 microns, efluid = 0.0011 kg/m-sec, k = 0.01381 zJ/molecule-K (Boltzmann's constant), T = 37C, and trepl ~ 1000 sec, a mild bacteremia with nbug = 0.1 106 CFU/ml (Section 2.1.4) throughout a blood volume of Vfluid = 5400 cm3 is reduced from an initial bacterial load of Nbug = 5.4 108 CFU down to Nbug < 1 CFU in ~460 sec (~8 min) at Ncoll = 1 or in ~5400 sec (~1.5 hr) using a therapeutic dose of 1012 microbivores (a "terabot" dose). A severe bacteremia with nbug = 100 106 CFU/ml (Section 2.1.4) is eliminated in ~620 sec (~10 min) at Ncoll = 1 or in ~7300 sec (~2 hr) at Ncoll = 10. A single 1-terabot (1012-device) intravenous dose of microbivores constitutes a volume of ~12 cm3 of devices and produces a nanocrit of Nct ~ 0.2% when injected into a normal adult human male patient, and could liberate up to 200 watts of systemic waste heat which is very near the maximum thermogenic limit for in vivo medical nanorobot systems [1, LINK].

Similar bacteremias could be eliminated in 1.5 hr (mild case) to 2.1 hr (severe case) using a 0.1 terabot dose if Ncoll = 1, but the infection cannot be controlled with only 1011 microbivores if Ncoll = 10 because the bacteria can replicate faster than the fixed microbivore population can capture and digest them in this situation. The breakeven microbivore dose that is just large enough to prevent the microbial population from expanding, but is too small to reduce it, is obtained by setting trepl > ~ t and is given by:

NMVmin > ~ (-9 ln(0.5) efluidVfluid / kT) (Rbug / (Rbug + 2RMV))3 (Ncoll/trepl) (nanorobots) 
(Eqn. 1)
>~ 1.6 1013 (Ncoll/trepl) (nanorobots) 
(Eqn. 2)
for the variables as given above, as an approximation when pcoll << 1 as will normally hold for up to ~terabot doses of micron-sized nanorobots. Interestingly, the effective nanorobot dosage is nearly independent of the blood concentration of microbes as long as NMV >> Nbug, as was earlier presumed.

While microbivores can fully eliminate septicemic infections in minutes to hours, natural phagocytic defenses -- even when aided by antibiotics -- can sometimes require weeks or months to achieve complete clearance of target bacteria from the bloodstream (Section 2.1). Thus microbivores appear to be up to ~1000 times faster-acting than either natural or antibiotic-assisted biological phagocytic defenses. Only when the pathogens are seriously crippled can the natural defenses achieve comparable clearance rates. For example, in one experiment [187] mice were able to clear ~80% of a 5000 CFU/gm dose of sialic acid-deficient group B streptococci by phagocytosis within 1 hour, whereas a like number of nondeficient streptococci similarly placed evaded phagocytic killing and disseminated to various tissues.

Another useful comparative perspective is that the administration of antibacterial agents (e.g., against E. coli) typically may increase the LD50 of that pathogen by ~500-fold using antibiotics [30] or ~850-fold using monoclonal antibodies [188]. For example, the mammalian LD50 for E. coli is ~0.1-1 106 CFU/ml [27-30], rising to ~108 CFU/ml with the administration of antibiotics. By employing a suitable dose of microbivores, a bloodstream bacterial concentration up to the theoretical maximum of ~1011 CFU/ml (~20% of blood volume assuming ~2 micron3 organisms) could be controlled, bringing another ~1000-fold improvement using nanomedicine and at last extending the therapeutic competence of the physician to the entire range of potential bacterial threats, including locally dense infections.

4.3 Microbivore Biocompatibility

Nanorobot biocompatibility [189-191] is a major topic whose complete discussion [192, LINK] is beyond the scope of this paper. A general observation is that it should be possible to endow nanorobots with surfaces of engineered nonadhesivity to serum opsonins and other bloodborne proteins [190], thus avoiding both nanorobot surface fouling and various systemic reactions such as complement activation, immune response, thrombogenicity, hypersensitivity, and nanopyrexia [191]. For example, biomimetic steric barriers (e.g., artificial glycocalyx [193]) might be deployed at the nanorobot surface as a coating over unoccupied hull areas of oligosaccharide surfactant polymers creating a 0.7-1.2 nm thick steric barrier at the nanorobot surface [160]. More research on devising such barriers in the nanomedical context is to be strongly encouraged.

For microbivores, several additional biocompatibility issues also must be explicitly addressed. First, nanorobots larger than ~1 micron in all three physical dimensions are subject to possible geometrical trapping in the fenestral slits of the splenic sinusoids in the red pulp of the spleen [192]. A small percentage of blood is forced to circulate through a physical filter in the spleen requiring passage through slits measuring 1-2 microns in width and ~6 microns in length [194-196]. Microbivores which become pinned to a slit face-on, or which become stuck edge-on during an attempted passage, can detect that they have become trapped by measuring various blood component concentration and pressure differentials across their surfaces. The nanorobot then activates its automatic splenofenestral escape protocol, which involves the extension and patterned ciliation of surface grapples until sensor readings reveal that passage through the slit is complete, which is then followed by grapple retraction.

Second, virtually every medical nanorobot placed inside the human body will encounter natural phagocytic cells many times during its mission [192, LINK]. Microbivores may incorporate any of several possible phagocyte avoidance and escape techniques [192, LINK], possibly including, for example, surface-tethered phagocyte chemorepellent molecules [197] or phagocyte engulfment inhibitors [198].

Third, the careless internalization of motile bacilli having long flagellar tails could result in the release of truncated bacterial tails into the bloodstream (Section 3.1.3). The typical bacterial flagellum is a close-packed rigid helix ~20 nm in diameter with a ~3 nm flagellin protein core, and its length is almost always >100 times its thickness [199], e.g., up to 10 microns long. There is significant antigenic diversity among bacterial flagellar epitopes [200-205] that white cells can recognize [206]. For example, Salmonella flagella are antigenically diverse and highly immunopotent [201] -- purified Salmonella typhi flagellar protein decreases CD14 expression and potently induces proinflammatory cytokine production (e.g., TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10, gamma interferon) by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and dramatically reduces expression of CD54 on macrophages, thus reducing the ability of those cells to take up soluble antigen [207]. Free releases of bacterial flagella into the bloodstream could produce inflammation or various immune system responses, thus should be avoided. Complete internalization of tail may be ensured by specialized operational routines (e.g., forced end-over-end rotation of an internalized microbe while inside the MC, thus completely spooling the tail into the microbivore before fully sealing the ingestion port door), by specialized mechanical tools or jigs (e.g., a counterrotating interdigitated-knobbed capstan-roller pair, not included in the present design), or by other means. The modulus of rigidity for representative Salmonella flagellum has been measured as ~1 1010 N/m2 [242]; from Eqn. 9.44 of Nanomedicine [1], the force required to buckle a 1-micron length of this flagellum is ~0.8 nN, far less than the ~100 nN force available from the MC chopping blade (Section 3.1.3).

Another microbivore-specific biocompatibility issue derives from the onboard presence of active artificial digestive enzymes. Although occurrences should be rare, stray intact artificial enzymes could be missed by the extraction rotors or could suffer some form of partial degradation and subsequently be egested into the bloodstream. Such enzymes or enzyme fragments could exhibit immunogenic, inflammatory, or other harmful activity in the body [208-212], produce localized hyperenzymemia [213] (often itself benign, as in hypertransaminasemia [214, 215]), or could serve as unintentional inflammatory mediators [216]. Fortunately, these artificial enzymes should prove quite fragile outside of the relatively well-controlled and protective microbivore internal environment, and should be rapidly attacked by natural enzymes and quickly degraded to harmless peptides and amino acids. Given a proper enzyme-transport system design, the release rate of such molecules should be extremely low.

Finally, the current microbivore design has an inherent minor iatrogenic vector vulnerability given that, in principle, an artificial virus could be created that would bind only to a region of the nanorobot surface that lies within the no-reach radius of the grapple arms. Since adjacent grapples cannot reach into this area either, a virus that affixes itself within the no-reach circle closest to the base of each grapple could not easily be dislodged mechanically. It may be possible to detect this unwanted passenger by noticing that some rotors are blocked in a particular area, but a forced reverse flow from blocked sorting rotors probably would not be sufficient to dislodge such a bound virion. In the case of a bloodborne virus, this is not a particularly serious concern since the virus was in the bloodstream anyway and little protection is conferred upon it simply by virtue of its being permanently bonded to the microbivore hull. The iatrogenic risk increases for more advanced microbivore-class nanorobots that can crawl through tissues, or move from organ to organ, or move between tissues and blood. This mobility creates a potential danger of inadvertently spreading a viral infection from one localized area to many other areas, should the virion subsequently become detached. For these devices, either an anti-blind-spot viral-removal protocol must be created and implemented, or else the blind spot must be removed by: (1) adding more angle links to the grapples, thus improving their reach; (2) positioning grapple silos closer together so an adjacent grapple arm can always reach into the blind spot; (3) adding specific virus dislodgement mechanisms analogous to physical wiper blades or localized jets of compressed gas at the base of every grapple silo; or (4) by otherwise eliminating the blind spot.

4.4 Extended Applications

The present microbivore design has emphasized the phagocytosis of isolated bloodborne bacterial pathogens. But microbivores, as a general class of medical nanorobots, have much broader applicability which can only briefly be summarized here.

4.4.1 Infections of Meninges and Cerebrospinal Fluid

Microbivores could be useful in the treatment of infections of the meninges and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). For example, bacterial counts in the CSF of children [217] and rhesus monkeys [218] with Hemophilus influenzae meningitis can range from 102-109 CFU/ml, and 105-106 CFU/ml is sufficient to produce inflammation [219]. Rabbit models show that a single intravenous ampicillin dose of ~0.125 gm (0.8 mg/ml blood) reduces H. influenzae bacteria in CSF from 107 CFU/ml to 2.2 103 CFU/ml after 8 hours, a bacterial kill rate of 10-0.46 CFU/ml-hr [220]. A similar rabbit model involving E. coli meningitis found bacterial kill rates of 10-0.88 CFU/ml-hr for cefotaxime and 10-0.77 CFU/ml-hr for pefloxacin at a dose rate of 0.5 mg/ml-hr [221]. The comparable bacterial kill rate for a similarly-sized single 0.01-terabot dose of microbivores delivered directly into the CSF (~0.8 mg/ml) could similarly reduce the CSF bacterial count from 107 CFU/ml to 2.2 103 CFU/ml in ~540 sec (9 min) optimistically assuming Ncoll ~ 1, is 10-24.4 CFU/ml-hr, a 53-fold improvement over ampicillin.

4.4.2 Systemic Inflammatory Cytokine Management

With minor additions, microbivores could be used to combat toxemia, the distribution throughout the body of poisonous products of bacteria growing in a focal or local site, and other biochemical sequelae of sepsis. For instance, E. coli-induced septicemic shock in vervet monkeys occurred at 425 106 CFU/ml and LPS endotoxin rose from normal at 0.076 ng/ml to a maximum of 1.130 ng/ml blood concentration [222]. In another study, endotoxin levels during a gram-negative bacterial infection rose from 0.2 to 2 ng/ml in pig blood [223]. Eliminating a bloodstream concentration of ~2 ng/ml of ~8 kDa LPS endotoxin [224] would require the extraction and enzymatic digestion of ~8 1014 LPS molecules from the ~5400 cm3 human blood compartment, a mere ~800 LPS molecules per nanorobot assuming a single terabot dose (1012 devices) of modified microbivores.

The high mortality associated with gram-negative sepsis is due in large measure to the patient's reaction to LPS, which induces the production of cytokines such as IL-1beta and IL-6 which leads to an uncontrolled inflammatory reaction resulting in tissue damage and organ failure [225]. Small quantities (~ng/ml) of LPS are released by living and growing bacteria (see previous paragraph), but the killing of bacteria using traditional antibiotic regimens often liberates large quantities of additional LPS, potentially up to ~105 ng/ml [225]. Such massive releases as occur with the use of antibiotics will not accompany the use of microbivores, because all bacterial components (including all cell-wall LPS) are internalized and fully digested into harmless nonantigenic molecules prior to discharge from the device. Microbivores thus represent a complete antimicrobial therapy without increasing the risk of sepsis or septic shock. (Note that while gram-positive organisms can also induce cytokine production, 100- to 1000-fold more gram-positive bacteria are needed to induce the same concentration of cytokines as are induced by gram-negative bacteria [225].)

If the patient presents with a septic condition before the microbivores are introduced, a substantial preexisting concentration of inflammatory cytokines will likely be present and must be extracted from the blood in concert with the principal antibacterial microbivore treatment. All unwanted cytokine molecules may be rapidly and systemically extracted from the blood using a modest dose of respirocyte-class nanodevices [2, LINK], a combination-treatment approach previously suggested elsewhere [1, LINK; 191, LINK]. Specifically, a 1-terabot intravenous dose of micron-size pharmacytes [1, LINK, LINK] each having ~105 cytokine-specific molecular sorting rotors and ~0.5 micron3 of onboard storage capacity could reduce the blood concentration of ~20 kDa IL-1beta and IL-6 cytokines from LPS-elevated levels of ~100 ng/ml [225] (~3 10-9 molecules/nm3) down to normal serum levels of ~10 pg/ml [226] (~3 10-13 molecules/nm3) after only ~200 sec of diffusion-limited pumping, using just ~0.1% of the available onboard storage volume. (Extracting an additional ~105 ng/ml of LPS from the bloodstream would take a similar amount of time and would use ~100% of the available onboard storage volume.)

A temporary sequestration of iron from the blood, mimicking the effect of lactoferrin released by natural phagocytes, could further enhance microbivore effectiveness by slowing the bacterial growth rate and increasing trepl.

4.4.3 Biofilm Digestion

Microbivores, slightly altered, could also be used to digest bacterial biofilms [227]. Biofilms may vary widely in thickness, which is limited more by nutrient transport than by surface roughness. In vitro experiments show that aerobic Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms can grow to 30-40 microns in depth as monocultures, but may increase in depth to 130 microns when the culture is amended with anaerobic bacteria [228]. Microbivores can digest biomaterial at a rate of ~4 micron3/min, hence an array of closely packed microbivores (~6.8 micron2/device) attached to a biofilm can consume the biofilm at a rate of ~10 nm/sec, requiring ~105 sec (~3 hr) to consume an entire 100-micron thick biofilm. Again, some means must be found to ensure a watertight seal between partially fragmented organisms and the microbivore ingestion port (Section 4.1).

4.4.4 Bacterial Infections in Other Fluids and Tissues

Bacteria present in sputum or in the mucous layers of the throat may be pursued by somewhat larger ambulatory microbivores having an additional array of longer grapples that could serve as locomotive mechanisms (legs), thus permitting the nanorobots to engage in microbial search-and-destroy missions along the luminal surfaces of the human trachea, bronchi, and bronchioles [229]. Normally there may be ~105 CFU/ml bacteria colonizing the oropharynx [230], >107 CFU/ml in sputum or throat swab during respiratory infections [231] or cystic fibrosis [232], and sputum infections up to ~4 108 CFU/ml have been reported [233, 234].

With additional modifications, other variants of microbivores could patrol tissues, organs, and nonsanguinous fluid spaces such as pleural [235], synovial [236], or urinary fluids (e.g., asymptomatic bacteriuria has >105 CFU/ml urine [237], >103 CFU/ml is pathogenic [238] or >102 CFU/ml with dysuria [237]), pursuing bacteria as they disseminate beyond the bloodstream. Vasculomobile microbivores could follow cytokine gradients and collect at sites of infection, thus increasing their microbicidal efficiency.

4.4.5 Viral, Fungal, and Parasitic Infections

Microbivores can rid the blood of viral pathogens, which are typically present during viremia at concentrations similar to those found in bacteremia, ~0.1-100 106/ml (Section 2.2). Viruses tend to be much smaller than most bacteria, so processing time per virion may be considerably reduced, perhaps 5-10 seconds or less. Apparently the human body is already fairly efficient at removing virus particles from the bloodstream -- for instance, in one study of HIV-1 infected patients, measurements of plasma virus loads found that individual virions had a clearance half-life of 28-100 min for HIV-1 and 100-182 min for hepatitis C (HCV) virus [239]. The difficulty for the natural defensive systems is that replacement viruses are rapidly replicated and discharged into the blood by infected cells, thus perpetuating the infection. For example, the daily particle production rate in HIV-1 infected patients has been estimated as 2-16 109 particles/day for HIV-1 and 0.4-10 1012 particles/day for HCV [239]. Such production rates are nevertheless easily controlled by a terabot population of microbivores which has a collective digestive capacity of >1015 virions/day. One additional complication, well within the competence of the the current microbivore design, is that some viruses like HIV are mutating constantly, so that one patient may have as many as 8-10 different strains concurrently, all of which must be successfully recognized and eliminated.

Fungemias involving particle loads of 1-1000 CFU/ml (Section 2.3) are rapidly cleared by microbivores. Fungal particles may be up to ~400 micron3 in volume, requiring ~100 min for complete digestion using a microbivorous protocol that employs careful piecewise digestion involving ~800 "bites" (Section 4.1). Blood parasites of comparable size (Section 2.4) may be present at concentrations similar to those found in bacteremia but may be controlled with terabot doses of microbivores.

4.4.6 Other Applications

Microbivores could be designed to trap and retain (without digesting) samples of unknown microbes found floating in the bloodstream, when those microbes fall within a certain physician-specified size range and are confirmed not to be platelets or chylomicrons. These samples could then be returned to the attending physician for further investigation, following nanapheresis. Ranging still further afield, microbivore-derived devices could be employed in veterinary and military applications; to disinfect surfaces, objects, and volumes (e.g., 102-105 CFU/ml bacteria found in the sink fluid of washbasin drains in a pediatric ward [240]) or to sterilize organic samples or edible foodstuffs; to clean up biohazards, biopolluted drinking water, toxic biochemicals, or other environmental organic materials spills, as in bioremediation; and in many other useful applications.

5. Conclusions

This paper presents a theoretical nanorobot scaling study for artificial mechanical phagocytes of microscopic size, called "microbivores," whose primary function is to destroy microbiological pathogens found in the human bloodstream using a digest and discharge protocol. Some images of microbivores are now available online.

The microbivore is an oblate spheroidal nanomedical device measuring 3.4 microns in diameter along its major axis and 2.00 microns in diameter along its minor axis, consisting of 610 billion precisely arranged structural atoms in a gross geometric volume of 12.1 micron3. During each cycle of operation, the target bacterium is bound to the surface of the microbivore via species-specific reversible binding sites. Telescoping robotic grapples emerge from silos in the device surface, establish secure anchorage to the microbe's plasma membrane, then transport the pathogen to the ingestion port at the front of the device where the cell is internalized into a morcellation chamber. After sufficient mechanical mincing, the morcellated remains are pistoned into a digestion chamber where a preprogrammed sequence of engineered enzymes are successively injected and extracted, reducing the morcellate primarily to monoresidue amino acids, mononucleotides, glycerol, free fatty acids and simple sugars, which are then harmlessly discharged into the environment, completing the cycle.

The device may consume up to 200 pW of continuous power while completely digesting trapped microbes at a maximum throughput of 2 micron3 of organic material per 30-second cycle. Microbivores are up to ~1000 times faster-acting than either natural or antibiotic-assisted biological phagocytic defenses, and are ~80 times more efficient as phagocytic agents than macrophages, in terms of volume/sec digested per unit volume of phagocytic agent. Besides intravenous bacterial scavenging, microbivores or related devices may also be used to help clear respiratory, urinary, or cerebrospinal bacterial infections; eliminate bacterial toxemias and biofilms; eradicate viral, fungal, and parasitic infections; disinfect surfaces, foodstuffs, or organic samples; and help clean up biohazards and toxic chemicals.

6. Acknowledgements

The author thanks Stephen S. Flitman, M.D., C. Christopher Hook, M.D., Ronald G. Landes, M.D., and also Forrest Bishop, Robert J. Bradbury, and Ralph C. Merkle, for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper; Forrest Bishop for 3D modeling sutdies; and Robert J. Bradbury for preparing the hypertext version of this document.

7. References

  1. Robert A. Freitas Jr., Nanomedicine, Volume I: Basic Capabilities, Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX, 1999. See at: http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMI.htm.

  2. Robert A. Freitas Jr., "Exploratory Design in Medical Nanotechnology: A Mechanical Artificial Red Cell," Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Immobil. Biotech. 26(1998):411-430. See at: http://www.foresight.org/Nanomedicine/Respirocytes.html.

  3. Robert A. Freitas Jr., "Clottocytes: Artificial Mechanical Platelets," Foresight Update No. 41, 30 June 2000, pp. 9-11. See at: http://www.imm.org/Reports/Rep018.html.

  4. A. Gullo, "Sepsis and organ dysfunction/failure. An overview," Minerva Anestesiol. 65(July-August 1999):529-540.

  5. Clayton L. Thomas, ed., Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary, 17th Edition, F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia PA, 1989.

  6. S.J. Cryz Jr., E. Furer, R. Germanier, "Simple model for the study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in leukopenic mice," Infect. Immun. 39(March 1983):1067-1071.

  7. John Heritage, "Septicaemia and Endocarditis," Laboratory and Scientific Medicine, MICR3290 Medical Microbiology, University of Leeds, November 1996; see at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/mbiology/ug/med/septendo.html.

  8. Robert Berkow, Mark H. Beers, Andrew J. Fletcher, eds., The Merck Manual of Medical Information, Merck Research Laboratories, Whitehouse Station NJ, 1997.

  9. Tina C. Westfall, "Blood-infecting bacteria found to resist drug therapy," Atlanta Business Chronicle, 17 April 1998; see at: http://atlanta.bcentral.com/atlanta/stories/1998/04/20/focus21.html.

  10. "Zovant (rhAPC) Clinical Trial for Sepsis Stopped by Eli Lilly," 29 June 2000; see at: http://www.pharmacology.about.com/health/pharmacology/library/0daily/00news/blnews000629_zovant.htm.

  11. Henry F. Chambers, "Chapter 32. Infectious Diseases: Bacterial & Chlamydial," in Lawrence M. Tierney, Jr., Stephen J. McPhee, Maxine A. Papadakis, eds., Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment, 35th Edition, Appleton and Lange, Stamford, CT, 1996, pp. 1192-1226.

  12. Physicians'  Desk Reference, 48th Edition, Medical Economics Data Production Company, Montvale, NJ, 1994.

  13. J. Govan, E. Reiss-Levy, L. Bader, M. Schonell, "Pseudomonas pneumonia with bacteraemia," Med. J. Aust. 1(23 April 1977):627-628.

  14. F. d'Herelle, The Bacteriophage: Its Role in Immunity, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore MD, 1922. Translated by G.H. Smith. See also: F. d'Herelle, The Bacteriophage and Its Clinical Applications, Thomas, Baltimore MD, 1930; A. Raiga-Clemenceau, "d'Herelle's bacteriophage and its therapeutic property," Sem. Hop. Ther. 50(March 1974):229-231 (in French).

  15. A.D. Doerman, "Lysis and lysis inhibition with Escherichia coli bacteriophage," J. Bacteriol. 55(1948):257-275.

  16. M.R. Geier, M.E. Trigg, C.R. Merril, "Fate of bacteriophage lambda in non-immune germ-free mice," Nature 246(23 November 1973):221-223.

  17. H.W. Smith, R.B. Huggins, "Successful treatment of experimental Escherichia coli infections in mice using phage: its general superiority over antibiotics," J. Gen. Microbiol. 128(February 1982):307-318.

  18. A.B. Chernomordik, "Bacteriophages and their therapeutic-prophylactic use," Med. Sestra. 48(June 1989):44-47. In Russian.

  19. J.S. Soothill, "Treatment of experimental infections of mice with bacteriophages," J. Med. Microbiol. 37(October 1992):258-261.

  20. J.S. Soothill, "Bacteriophage prevents destruction of skin grafts by Pseudomonas aeruginosa," Burns 20(June 1994):209-211.

  21. J. Lederberg, "Smaller fleas .. ad infinitum: therapeutic bacteriophage redux," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 93(16 April 1996):3167-3168.

  22. P.A. Barrow, J.S. Soothill, "Bacteriophage therapy and prophylaxis: rediscovery and renewed assessment of potential," Trends Microbiol. 5(July 1997):268-271.

  23. J. Alisky, K. Iczkowski, A. Rapoport, N. Troitsky, "Bacteriophages show promise as antimicrobial agents," J. Infect. 36(January 1998):5-15.

  24. B.I. Koerner, "Return of a killer. Phages may once again fight tough bacterial infections," U.S. News & World Rep. 125(2 November 1998):51-52.

  25. R.M. Carlton, "Phage therapy: past history and future prospects," Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. (Warsz) 47(1999):267-274.

  26. R.J. Payne, D. Phil, V.A. Jansen, "Phage therapy: the peculiar kinetics of self-replicating pharmaceuticals," Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 68(September 2000):225-230.

  27. C.R. Merril, B. Biswas, R. Carlton, N.C. Jensen, G.J. Creed, S. Zullo, S. Adhya, "Long-circulating bacteriophage as antibacterial agents," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 93(16 April 1996):3188-3192.

  28. C. Lam, F. Turnowsky, G. Hogenauer, E. Schutze, "Effect of a diazaborine derivative (Sa 84.474) on the virulence of Escherichia coli," J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 20(July 1987):37-45.

  29. O. Rokke, K.E. Giercksky, A. Revhaug, "Depression of plasma endotoxin levels during gram-negative septicemia subsequent to moderate trauma," Acta Chir. Scand. 155(March 1989):145-149.

  30. S.E. Bucklin, D.C. Morrison, "Bacteremia versus endotoxemia in experimental mouse leukopenia -- role of antibiotic chemotherapy," J. Infect. Dis. 174(December 1996):1249-1254.

  31. D.F. Stojdl, B. Lichty, S. Knowles, R. Marius, H. Atkins, N. Sonenberg, J.C. Bell, "Exploiting tumor-specific defects in the interferon pathway with a previously unknown oncolytic virus," Nat. Med. 6(July 2000):821-825.

  32. H.N. Schulz, T. Brinkhoff, T.G. Ferdelman, M. Hernandez Marine, A. Teske, B.B. Jorgensen, "Dense Populations of a Giant Sulfur Bacterium in Namibian Shelf Sediments," Science 284(16 April 1999):493-495.

  33. E. Olavi Kajander, Neva Ciftcioglu, "Nanobacteria: An alternative mechanism for pathogenic intra- and extracellular calcification and stone formation," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95(7 July 1998):8274-8279; J.T. Hjelle et al, "Endotoxin and nanobacteria in polycystic kidney disease," Kidney Int. 57(June 2000):2360-2374.

  34. J.O. Cisar, D.Q. Xu, J. Thompson, W. Swaim, L. Hu, D.J. Kopecko, "An alternative interpretation of nanobacteria-induced biomineralization," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 97(10 October 2000):11511-11515.

  35. H.J. Morowitz, M.E. Tourtellotte, "The Smallest Living Cells," Scientific American 206(March 1962):117-126.

  36. Bacterial size data found at numerous websites: http://www.bact.wisc.edu/Bact330/lecturespyo; http://www.bact.wisc.edu/Bact330/lecturestaph; http://www.worldwidevaccines.com/public/diseas/typ8.asp; http://www.copewithcytokines.de/cope.cgi?2151; http://anka.livstek.lth.se:2080/microscopy/f-bacter.htm; http://www.moag.gov.il/brunet/public_sub1_p3.htmlhttp://scimath.gsw.edu/belder/leek599.htm; http://www.y2knorth.com/images/msr/ceramic.html; http://gsbs.utmb.edu/microbook/ch016.htm; http://www.bio.psu.edu/people/faculty/whittam/apdbase/bacteria.html; http://www.indiaserver.com/thehindu/2000/09/07/stories/0807048f.htm; http://www.awwarf.com/newprojects/pathegeons/YERSINIA.html; http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/~kunkel/gallery/bacteria/page009/97241a.html.

  37. S. Humphreys, A. Stevenson, A. Bacon, A.B. Weinhardt, M. Roberts, "The alternative s factor, sE, is critically important for the virulence of Salmonella typhimurium," Infect. Immun. 67(April 1999):1560-1568.

  38. S.W. Bearden, R.D. Perry, "The Yfe system of Yersinia pestis transports iron and manganese and is required for full virulence of plague," Mol. Microbiol. 32(April 1999):403-414.

  39. A.H. Fortier, M.V. Slayter, R. Ziemba, M.S. Meltzer, C.A. Nacy, "Live vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis: infection and immunity in mice," Infect. Immun. 59(September 1991):2922-2928.

  40. E.G. Ford, P.J. Hennessey, L.M. Jennings, T. Black, R.J. Andrassy, "g-globulin enhances survival in pneumococcal-challenged asplenic infant rats," J. Pediatr. Surg. 24(August 1989):815-817.

  41. J. Dahlinger, S.L. Marks, D.C. Hirsh, "Prevalance and identity of translocating bacteria in healthy dogs," J. Vet. Intern. Med. 11(November-December 1997):319-322.

  42. N. Hasegawa, I. Kondo, S. Hoshina, K. Kurosaka, H. Igarashi, "Effect of highly purified coagulase and culture filtrate on virulence and immunity of a coagulase-negative mutant of Staphylococcus aureus BB," Infect. Immun. 39(March 1983):1236-1242.

  43. I.M. Nilsson, J.C. Lee, T. Bremell, C. Ryden, A. Tarkowski, "The role of staphylococcal polysaccharide microcapsule expression in septicemia and septic arthritis," Infect. Immun. 65(October 1997):4216-4221.

  44. L. Tissi, C. von Hunolstein, F. Bistoni, M. Marangi, L. Parisi, G. Orefici, "Role of group B streptococcal capsular polysaccharides in the induction of septic arthritis," J. Med. Microbiol. 47(August 1998):717-723.

  45. A. Ohno et al, "The study of pathogenic mechanisms of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections by mucoid strains," Kansenshogaku Zasshi 66(March 1992):407-415. In Japanese.

  46. P. Inarrea, J. Gomez-Cambronero, J. Pascual, M.C. Ponte, L. Hernando, M. Sanchez-Crespo, "Synthesis of PAF-acether and blood volume changes in gram-negative sepsis," Immunopharmacology 9(February 1985):45-52.

  47. C. Bogni, M. Segura, J. Giraudo, A. Giraudo, A. Calzolari, R. Nagel, "Avirulence and immunogenicity in mice of a bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus mutant," Can. J. Vet. Res. 62(October 1998):293-298.

  48. Na-Gyong Lee, Bo-Young Ahn, Sang Bo Jung, Young Gikim, Younha Lee, Hyun-Su Kim, Wan Je Park, "Human anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane proteins IgG cross-protective against infection with heterologous immunotype strains of P. aeruginosa iY2," FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 25(1999):339-347. See at:

  49. S. Mizobuchi, J. Minami, F. Jin, O. Matsushita, A. Okabe, "Comparison of the virulence of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus," Microbiol. Immunol. 38(1994):599-605.

  50. D. Jurgens, B. Sterzik, F.J. Fehrenbach, "Unspecific binding of group B streptococcal cocytolysin (CAMP factor) to immunoglobulins and its possible role in pathogenicity," J. Exp. Med. 165(1 March 1987):720-732.

  51. N. Hasegawa, I. Kondo, "Isolation and virulence of a caseinase- and bound coagulase-deficient mutant of Staphylococcus aureus BB," J. Infect. Dis. 149(April 1984):538-543.

  52. W.M. Stanley, E.G. Valens, Viruses and the Nature of Life, Dutton, NY, 1961.

  53. Benjamin Harrow, Abraham Mazur, Textbook of Biochemistry, 7th Edition, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia PA, 1958.

  54. R.W. Coombs, A.C. Collier, J.P. Allain, B. Nikora, M. Leuther, G.F. Gjerset, L. Corey, "Plasma viremia in human immunodeficiency virus infection," N. Engl. J. Med. 321(14 December 1989):1626-1631.

  55. E.S. Daar, T. Moudgil, R.D. Meyer, D.D. Ho, "Transient high levels of viremia in patients with primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection," N. Engl. J. Med. 324(4 April 1991):961-964.

  56. V. Soriano, M. Gomez-Cano, A. Mas, N. Villalba, J. Castilla, M. Adrados, F. Laguna, R. Polo, J. Gonzalez-Lahoz, "Quantification of viremia in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus with different degrees of immunosuppression," Rev. Clin. Esp. 197(December 1997):810-813. In Spanish.

  57. O.M. Diop et al, "High levels of viral replication during primary simian immunodeficiency virus SIVagm infection are rapidly and strongly controlled in African green monkeys," J. Virol. 74(August 2000):7538-7547.

  58. A. Zellos, D.L. Thomas, C. Mocilnikar, E.J. Perlman, J.K. Boitnott, J.F. Casella, K.B. Schwarz, "High viral load and mild liver injury in children with hemophilia compared with other children with chronic hepatitis C virus infection," J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 29(October 1999):418-423. See also: Albrecht Ernst, "What is Viral Load?" Hepatitis Central; see at: http://hepatitis-central.com/hcv/whatis/vl.html.

  59. J.J. Lefrere, C. Ferec, F. Roudot-Thoraval, P. Loiseau, J.F. Cantaloube, P. Biagini, M. Mariotti, G. LeGac, B. Mercier, "GBV-C/hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA load in immunodeficient individuals and in immunocompetent individuals," J. Med. Virol. 59(September 1999):32-37.

  60. J.K. Christensen, J. Eugen-Olsen, M. Slrenson, H. Ullum, S.B. Gjedde, B.K. Pedersen, J.O. Nielsen, K. Krogsgaard, "Prevalence and prognostic significance of infection with TT virus in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus," J. Infect. Dis. 181(May 2000):1796-1799.

  61. K. Makimura, K. Yamamoto, C. Sugita, K. Shibuya, H. Yamaguchi, "Blood lysate staining, a new microscopic method for diagnosis of fungemia using peripheral blood," Microbiol. Immunol. 44(2000):637-641.

  62. R.L. Schelonka, M.K. Chai, B.A. Yoder, D. Hensley, R.M. Brockett, D.P. Ascher, "Volume of blood required to detect common neonatal pathogens," J. Pediatr. 129(August 1996):275-278.

  63. J. Bille, R.S. Edson, G.D. Roberts, "Clinical evaluation of the lysis-centrifugation blood culture system for the detection of fungemia and comparison with a conventional biphasic broth blood culture system," J. Clin. Microbiol. 19(February 1984):126-128.

  64. R.H. Eng, E. Bishburg, S.M. Smith, A. Mangia, "Fungemia observations of peripheral tissue clearance in humans," J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 30(1992):471-475.

  65. G.M. Matuschak, A.J. Lechner, "The yeast to hyphal transition following hematogenous candidiasis induces shock and organ injury independent of circulating tumor necrosis factor-alpha," Crit. Care Med. 25(January 1997):111-120.

  66. G.R. Barber, A.E. Brown, T.E. Kiehn, F.F. Edwards, D. Armstrong, "Catheter-related Malassezia furfur fungemia in immunocompromised patients," Am. J. Med. 95(October 1993):365-370.

  67. T.E. Kiehn, E. Gorey, A.E. Brown, F.F. Edwards, D. Armstrong, "Sepsis due to Rhodotorula related to use of indwelling central venous catheters," Clin. Infect. Dis. 14(April 1992):841-846.

  68. Abdul Ghaffar, "Parasitology -- Lecture Two: Blood and Tissue Protozoa," MBIM 650/720 Medical Microbiology -- Lecture:81-82, Microbiology and Immunology On-Line, University of South Carolina, 2 December 2000; see at: http://www.med.sc.edu:85/parasitology/blood-proto.htm.

  69. Robert S. Goldsmith, "Chapter 34. Infectious Diseases: Protozoal & Helminthic," in Lawrence M. Tierney, Jr., Stephen J. McPhee, Maxine A. Papadakis, eds., Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment, 35th Edition, Appleton and Lange, Stamford, CT, 1996, pp. 1246-1305.

  70. I.J. Camargo, P.M. Araujo, J.K. Sakurada, D.R. Stach-Machado, H.A. Rangel, "Trypanosoma cruzi: early resistance induced by culture-derived trypomastigotes," Exp. Parasitol. 73(October 1991):260-268.

  71. M.E. Rottenberg, D.A. Rodriguez, A. Orn, "Control of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice deprived of T-cell help," Scand. J. Immunol. 36(August 1992):261-268.

  72. P. Diffley, J.O. Scott, K. Mama, T.N. Tsen, "The rate of proliferation among African trypanosomes is a stable trait that is directly related to virulence," Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 36(May 1987):533-540.

  73. Rayhan Hashmey, Wayne X. Shandera, "Chapter 31. Infectious Diseases: Viral & Rickettsial," in Lawrence M. Tierney, Jr., Stephen J. McPhee, Maxine A. Papadakis, eds., Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment, 35th Edition, Appleton and Lange, Stamford, CT, 1996, pp. 1158-1191.

  74. S.T. Kieser, I.S. Eriks, G.H. Palmer, "Cyclic rickettsemia during persistent Anaplasma marginale infection of cattle," Infect. Immun. 58(April 1990):1117-1119.

  75. L.G. Kaplowitz, J.V. Lange, J.J. Fischer, D.H. Walker, "Correlation of rickettsial titers, circulating endotoxin, and clinical features in Rocky Mountain spotted fever," Arch. Intern. Med. 143(June 1983):1149-1151.

  76. E.F. Fincher, L. Johannsen, L. Kapas, S. Takahashi, J.M. Krueger, "Microglia digest Staphylococcus aureus into low molecular weight biologically active compounds," Am. J. Physiol. 271(July 1996):R149-R156.

  77. T.W. Bell, Z. Hou, Y. Luo, M.G.B. Drew, E. Chapoteau, B.P. Czech, A. Kumar, "Detection of Creatinine by a Designed Receptor," Science 269(4 August 1995):671-674.

  78. Li-Qun Gu, Stephen Cheley, Hagan Bayley, "Capture of a Single Molecule in a Nanocavity," Science 291(26 January 2001):636-640.

  79. Tilman Schirmer, Thomas A. Keller, Yan-Fei Wang, Jurg P. Rosenbusch, "Structural Basis for Sugar Translocation Through Maltoporin Channels at 3.1 Angstrom Resolution," Science 267(27 January 1995):512-514.

  80. Frank A. Schabert, Christian Henn, Andreas Engel, "Native Escherichia coli OmpF Porin Surfaces Probed by Atomic Force Microscopy," Science 268(7 April 1995):92-94.

  81. Olaf Schneewind, Audree Fowler, Kym F. Faull, "Structure of the Cell Wall Anchor of Surface Proteins in Staphylococcus aureus," Science 268(7 April 1995):103-106.

  82. P.J. Brennan, H. Nikaido, "The envelope of mycobacteria," Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64(1995):29-63.

  83. H.J. Rogers, in Aspects of Microbiology, Volume 7, Van Nostrand Reinhold, Wokingham, UK, 1983, pp. 6-25.

  84. J.-M. Ghuysen, G.D. Shockman, in L. Leive, ed., Bacterial Membranes and Walls, Volume 1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1973.

  85. N.T. Perna et al, "Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7," Nature 409(25 January 2001):529-533.

  86. O.D. Liang, M. Maccarana, J.I. Flock, M. Paulsson, K.T. Preissner, T. Wadstrom, "Multiple interactions between human vitronectin and Staphylococcus aureus," Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1225(25 November 1993):57-63.

  87. P.A. Manning, J.K. Timmis, A. Moll, K.N. Timmis, "Mutants that overproduce TraTp, a plasmid-specified major outer membrane protein of Escherichia coli," Mol. Gen. Genet. 187(1982):426-431; A. Moll, P.A. Manning, K.N. Timmis, "Plasmid-determined resistance to serum bactericidal activity: a major outer membrane protein, the traT gene product, is responsible for plasmid-specified serum resistance in Escherichia coli," Infect. Immun. 28(May 1980):359-367.

  88. L. Visai, S. Bozzini, G. Raucci, A. Toniolo, P. Speziale, "Isolation and characterization of a novel collagen-binding protein from Streptococcus pyogenes strain 6414," J. Biol. Chem. 270(6 January 1995):347-353.

  89. P. Speziale, G. Raucci, L. Visai, L.M. Switalski, R. Timpl, M. Hook, "Binding of collagen to Staphylococcus aureus Cowan 1," J. Bacteriol. 167(July 1986):77-81.

  90. W.R. Tulip, J.N. Varghese, W.G. Laver, R.G. Webster, P.M. Colman, "Refined crystal structure of the influenza virus N9 neuraminidase-NC41 Fab complex," J. Mol. Biol. 227(5 September 1992):122-148; J.N. Varghese, W.G. Laver, P.M. Colman, "Structure of the influenza virus glycoprotein antigen neuraminidase at 2.9 A resolution," Nature 303(5-11 May 1983):35-40.

  91. Lei Jin, James A. Wells, "Dissecting the energetics of an antibody-antigen interface by alanine shaving and molecular grafting," Protein Science 3(1994):2351-2357.

  92. D.R. Davies, G.H. Cohen, "Interactions of protein antigens with antibodies," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 93(9 January 1996):7-12.

  93. K. Eric Drexler, Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation, John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1992.

  94. A. Umeda, M. Saito, K. Amako, "Surface characteristics of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in an atomic force microscope image," Microbiol. Immunol. 42(1998):159-164.

  95. Nanne Nanninga, "Morphogenesis of Escherichia coli," Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62(March 1998):110-129.

  96. J.V. Holtje, "Growth of the stress-bearing and shape-maintaining murein sacculus of Escherichia coli," Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62(March 1998):181-203.

  97. X. Yao, M. Jericho, D. Pink, T. Beveridge, "Thickness and elasticity of gram-negative murein sacculi measured by atomic force microscopy," J. Bacteriol. 181(November 1999):6865-6875.

  98. R.E. Burge, A.G. Fowler, D.A. Reaveley, "Structure of the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls. I." J. Mol. Biol. 117(25 December 1977):927-953.

  99. A.L. Koch, "The surface stress theory of microbial morphogenesis," Adv. Microbial Physiol. 24(1983):301-366.

  100. A. Boulbitch, "Deformation of the envelope of a spherical gram-negative bacterium during the atomic force microscopic measurements," J. Electron. Microsc. (Tokyo) 49(2000):459-462.

  101. C.R. Thomas, M. Al-Rubeai, Z. Zhang, "Prediction of mechanical damage to animal cells in turbulence," Cytotechnology 15(1994):329-335.

  102. E.C. Wang, S.H. Hung, M. Cahoon, L. Hedstrom, "The role of the Cys191-Cys220 disulfide bond in trypsin: new targets for engineering substrate specificity," Protein Eng. 10(April 1997):405-411.

  103. T.F. Spande, B. Witkop, Y. Degani, A. Patchomik, "Selective cleavage and modification of peptides and proteins," Adv. Protein Chem. 24(1970):97-260.

  104. E. Kasafirek, P. Fric, J. Slaby, F. Malis, "p-Nitroanilides of 3-carboxypropionyl-peptides. Their cleavage by elastase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin," Eur. J. Biochem. 69(1 October 1976):1-13.

  105. Robert K. Murray, Daryl K. Granner, Peter A. Mayes, Victor W. Rodwell, Harper's Biochemistry, 23rd Edition, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk CT, 1993.

  106. Y. Asano, A. Nakazawa, Y. Kato, K. Kondo, "Properties of a novel D-stereospecific aminopeptidase from Ochrobactrum anthropi," J. Biol. Chem. 264(25 August 1989):14233-14239.

  107. H. Komeda, Y. Asano, "Gene cloning, nucleotide sequencing, and purification and characterization of the D-stereospecific amino-acid amidase from Ochrobactrum anthropi SV3," Eur. J. Biochem. 267(April 2000):2028-2035.

  108. Y. Asano, Y. Kato, A. Yamada, K. Kondo, "Structural similarity of D-aminopeptidase to carboxypeptidase DD and beta-lactamases," Biochemistry 31(3 March 1992):2316-2328.

  109. K. Kubo, T. Ishikura, Y. Fukagawa, "Deacetylation of PS-5, a new beta-lactam compound. III. Enzymological characterization of L-amino acid acylase and D-amino acid acylase from Pseudomonas sp. 1158," J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 33(June 1980):556-565.

  110. A. Nureddin, T. Inagami, "Chemical modification of amino groups and guanidino groups of trypsin. Preparation of stable and soluble derivatives," Biochem. J. 147(April 1975):71-81.

  111. K.H. Bae, J.S. Jang, K.S. Park, S.H. Lee, S.M. Byun, "Improvement of thermal stability of subtilisin J by changing the primary autolysis site," Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 207(6 February 1995):20-24.

  112. J. Mansfeld, G. Vriend, B.W. Dijkstra, O.R. Veltman, B. Van den Burg, G. Venema, R. Ulbrich-Hofmann, V.G. Eijsink, "Extreme stabilization of a thermolysin-like protease by an engineered disulfide bond," J. Biol. Chem. 272(25 April 1997):11152-11156.

  113. E. Varallyay, G. Pal, A. Patthy, L. Szilagyi, L. Graf, "Two mutations in rat trypsin confer resistance against autolysis," Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 243(4 February 1998):56-60.

  114. X.F. Li, X. Nie, J.G. Tang, "Anti-autolysis of trypsin by modification of autolytic site Arg117," Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 250(18 September 1998):235-239.

  115. M. Sahin-Toth, "Hereditary pancreatitis-associated mutuation asn(21) ile stabilizes rat trypsinogen in vitro," J. Biol. Chem. 274(15 October 1999):29699-29704; J. Biol. Chem. 275(5 May 2000):14004 (erratum).

  116. M. Sahin-Toth, L. Graf, M. Toth, "Trypsinogen stabilization by mutation Arg117 His: a unifying pathomechanism for hereditary pancreatitis?" Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 264(22 October 1999):505-508.

  117. V. Keil-Dlouha, "Chemical characterization and study of the autodigestion of pure collagenase from Achromobacter iophagus," Biochim. Biophys. Acta 429(11 March 1976):239-251.

  118. E. Kessler, M. Safrin, W.R. Abrams, J. Rosenbloom, D.E. Ohman, "Inhibitors and specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasA," J. Biol. Chem. 272(11 April 1997):9884-9889.

  119. B. Tomkinson, "Tripeptidyl peptidases: enzymes that count," Trends Biochem. Sci. 24(September 1999):355-359.

  120. J. Rahfeld, M. Schutkowski, J. Faust, K. Neubert, A. Barth, J. Heins, "Extended investigation of the substrate specificity of dipeptidyl peptidase IV from pig kidney," Biol. Chem. Hoppe. Seyler. 372(May 1991):313-318.

  121. Arthur Kornberg, Tania A. Baker, DNA Replication, Second Edition, W.H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1992.

  122. S.J. Mustafa, R. Rubio, R.M. Berne, "Uptake of adenosine by dispersed chick embryonic cardiac cells," Am. J. Physiol. 228(January 1975):62-67.

  123. H. Jyonouchi, R.J. Hill, R.A. Good, "RNA/nucleotide enhances antibody production in vitro and is moderately mitogenic to murine spleen lymphocytes," Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 200(May 1992):101-108.

  124. H. Jyonouchi, "Nucleotide actions on humoral immune responses," J. Nutr. 124(January 1994):138S-143S; J. Navarro, A. Ruiz-Bravo, M. Jimenez-Valera, A. Gil, "Modulation of antibody-forming cell and mitogen-driven lymphoproliferative responses by dietary nucleotides in mice," Immunol. Lett. 53(November 1996):141-145.

  125. B. Seitanidis, D.W. Moss, "Serum alkaline phosphatase and 5'-nucleotidase levels during normal pregnancy," Clin. Chim. Acta 25(July 1969):183-184.

  126. W.C. van Helden, W. van der Slik, J.P. Persijn, J.H. Souverijn, "Automated method for the determination of 5'-nucleotidase in serum by continuous flow analysis," J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 18(June 1980):333-337.

  127. M.H. Jensen, A. Iversen, I. Hagerstrand, "The 5'-nucleotidase activity in normal human serum. Electrophoretic patterns and substrate specificity," Clin. Chim. Acta 104(10 June 1980):221-226.

  128. S. Ramagopal, G.H. Reem, "Activities of purine nucleotide metabolizing enzymes in human thymocytes and peripheral blood T lymphocytes: in vitro effect of thymic hormones," Thymus 4(May 1982):163-172.

  129. N.N. Chuang, A.C. Newby, J.P. Luzio, "Characterization of different molecular forms of 5'-nucleotidase in normal serum and in serum from cholestatic patients and bile-duct-ligated rats," Biochem. J. 224(15 December 1984):689-695.

  130. S.A. Al-Mudhaffar, V. Saadalla, "Further studies on 5'-nucleotidase from serum of liver cirrhotic individuals," Biochem. Exp. Biol. 14(1978):347-357.

  131. C.S. Fortman, D.L. Witte, "Serum 5'-nucleotidase in patients receiving anti-epileptic drugs," Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 84(August 1985):197-201.

  132. M. Fukano, S. Amano, F. Hazama, S. Hosoda, "5'-nucleotidase activities in sera and liver tissues of viral hepatitis patients," Gastroenterol. Jpn. 25(April 1990):199-205.

  133. M. Walia, M. Mahajan, K. Singh, "Serum adenosine deaminase, 5'-nucleotidase and alkaline phosphatase in breast cancer patients," Indian J. Med. Res. 101(June 1995):247-249.

  134. J.R. Chipley, M.S. Dreyfuss, R.A. Smucker, "Cholesterol metabolism by Mycobacterium," Microbios. 12(1975):199-207.

  135. M. Hayami, A. Okabe, R. Kariyama, M. Abe, Y. Kanemasa, "Lipid composition of Staphylococcus aureus and its derived L-forms," Microbiol. Immunol. 23(1979):435-442.

  136. J.B. Baseman, J.G. Tully, "Mycoplasmas: sophisticated, reemerging, and burdened by their notoriety," Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3(January-March 1997):21-32.

  137. E. Yavin, S. Gatt, "Enzymatic hydrolysis of sphingolipids. 8. Further purification and properties of of rat brain ceramidase," Biochemistry 8(April 1969):1692-1698; R.D. Duan, A. Nilsson, "Sphingolipid hydrolyzing enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract," Methods Enzymol. 311(2000):276-286.

  138. K. Bernardo, R. Hurwitz, T. Zenk, R.J. Desnick, K. Ferlinz, E.H. Schuchman, K. Sandhoff, "Purification, characterization, and biosynthesis of human acid ceramidase," J. Biol. Chem. 270(12 May 1995):11098-11102.

  139. F.S. Hagen, F.J. Grant, J.L. Kuijper, C.A. Slaughter, C.R. Moomaw, K. Orth, P.J. O'Hara, R.S. Munford, "Expression and characterization of recombinant human acyloxyacyl hydrolase, a leukocytic enzyme that deacylates bacterial lipopolysaccharides," Biochemistry 30(27 August 1991):8415-8423.

  140. Bruce Alberts, Dennis Bray, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, James D. Watson, The Molecular Biology of the Cell, Second Edition, Garland Publishing, Inc., New York, 1989.

  141. Wayne M. Becker, David W. Deamer, The World of the Cell, Second Edition, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Redwood City CA, 1991.

  142. Geoffrey Zubay, Biochemistry, 3rd Edition, William C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque IA, 1993.

  143. G.N. Rudenskaya, A.M. Shmoilov, V.A. Isaev, A.V. Ksenofontov, S.V. Shvets, "Aminopeptidase PC from the hepatopancreas of the Kamchatka crab Paralithodes camtshatica," Biochemistry (Mosc.) 65(February 2000):164-170.

  144. J.A. Kramps, C. van Twisk, A.C. van der Linden, "L-Pyroglutamyl-L-prolyl-L-valine-p-nitroanilide, a highly specific substrate for granulocyte elastase," Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 43(September 1983):427-432.

  145. E. Siigur, A. Mahar, J. Siigur, "b-fibrinogenase from the venom of Vipera lebetina," Toxicon. 29(1991):107-118.

  146. L.M. Silva, C.R. Diniz, A. Magalhaes, "Purification and partial characterization of an arginine ester hydrolase from the venom of the bushmaster snake, Lachesis muta noctivaga," Toxicon. 23(1985):707-718.

  147. Y.M. Lin, "Characterization and peptidase specificity of lugworm (Arenicola cristata) protease C," Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 95(1990):745-753.

  148. F.E. Indig, D. Ben-Meir, A. Spungin, S. Blumberg, "Investigation of neutral endopeptidases (EC and of neutral proteinases (EC using a new sensitive two-stage enzymatic reaction," FEBS Lett. 255(25 September 1989):237-240.

  149. C.J. Martin, W.J. Evans, "Phytic acid-enhanced metal ion exchange reactions: the effect on carboxypeptidase A," J. Inorg. Biochem. 35(April 1989):267-288.

  150. H. Scholze, W. Schulte, "Purification and partial characterization of the major cysteine protease from Entamoeba invadens," Biomed. Biochim. Acta 49(1990):455-463.

  151. C. Duez, J.M. Frere, J.M. Ghuysen, J. Van Beeumen, L. Delcambe, L. Dierickx, "Purification and properties of the exocellular beta-lactamase of Actinomadura strain R39," Biochim. Biophys. Acta 700(4 January 1982):24-32.

  152. W. Stocker, M. Ng, D.S. Auld, "Fluorescent oligopeptide substrates for kinetic characterization of the specificity of Astacus protease," Biochemistry 29(13 November 1990):10418-10425.

  153. M.E. DiSanto, Q.H. Li, D.A. Logan, "Purification and characterization of a developmentally regulated carboxypeptidase from Mucor racemosus," J. Bacteriol. 174(January 1992):447-455.

  154. M. Migaud, C. Durieux, J. Viereck, E. Soroca-Lucas, M.C. Fournie-Zaluski, B.P. Roques, "The in vivo metabolism of cholecystokinin (CCK-8) is essentially ensured by aminopeptidase A," Peptides 17(1996):601-607.

  155. P. Varmanen, T. Rantanen, A. Palva, "An operon from Lactobacillus helveticus composed of a proline iminopeptidase gene (pepI) and two genes coding for putative members of the ABC transporter family of proteins," Microbiology 142(December 1996):3459-3468.

  156. I. Matsui, E. Matsui, K. Ishikawa, S. Miyairi, K. Honda, "The enzymatic and molecular characteristics of Saccaromycopsis alpha-amylase secreted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae," Agric. Biol. Chem. 54(August 1990):2009-2015.

  157. A.H. Ullah, B.J. Cummins, "Aspergillus ficuum extracellular pH 6.0 optimum acid phosphatase: purification, N-terminal amino sequence, and biochemical characterization," Prep. Biochem. 18(1988):37-65.

  158. Peter Friedhoff, Bettina Kolmes, Oleg Gimadutdinow, Wolfgang Wende, Kurt L. Krause, Alfred Pingoud, "Analysis of the mechanism of the Serratia nuclease using site-directed mutagenesis," Nucleic Acids Res. 24(15 July 1996):2632-2639.

  159. E.J. Gilbert, A. Cornish, C.W. Jones, "Purification and properties of extracellular lipase from Pseudomonas aeruginosaEF2," J. Gen. Microbiol. 137(September 1991):2223-2229.

  160. H.M. Chen, T.J. Dimagno, W. Wang, E. Leung, C.H. Lee, S.I. Chan, "The effect of Glu75 of staphylococcal nuclease on enzyme activity, protein stability and protein unfolding," Eur. J. Biochem. 261(May 1999):599-609.

  161. H.C. Froede, I.B. Wilson, "The slow rate of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by fluoride," Mol. Pharmacol. 27(June 1985):630-633.

  162. T.H. Maren, G.C. Wynns, P.J. Wistrand, "Chemical properties of carbonic anhydrase IV, the membrane-bound enzyme," Mol. Pharmacol. 44(October 1993):901-905.

  163. M.B. Elowitz, M.G. Surette, P.E. Wolf, J.B. Stock, S. Leibler, "Protein mobility in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli," J. Bacteriol. 181(January 1999):197-203.

  164. "The Role of Enzymes in Biological Reactions," Natural Toxins Research Center, Texas A&M University -- Kingsville; see at: http://ntri.tamuk.edu/cell/enzyme.html. See also: Darren Branch, "Biophysics 254, Homework Assignment #5 -- Key, 24 February 1997," Beckman Institute; see at: http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~bioph254/Homework/hw5.html. See also: http://bob.usuhs.mil/biochem/exams/1992/exam2-92/node37.html.

  165. David W. Brooks, "List of Free Energies for Hydrolysis of Favorite Metabolites," in Chemistry of Life Processes -- energy and metabolism, 5 January 2001, Center for Curriculum and Instruction, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; see at: http://dwb.unl.edu/Teacher/NSF/C11/C11Content.html; see also: http://www-class.unl.edu/bioc431/lectures/bioenergetics.html.

  166. H.A. Krebs, H.L. Kornberg, Energy Transformations in Living Matter, Springer, NY, 1957.

  167. Daniel Goldin, "Remarks at the 15th Annual NASA Continual Improvement and Reinvention Conference, 27 April 2000; see at: http://rk.gsfc.nasa.gov/richcontent/Speeches/golden_remarks_5ps.pdf.

  168. Nancy Leveson, Information and Computer Science Dept., Univ. of California, Irvine, "Viking Lander," The Risks Digest 3(1 October 1986); see at:

  169. Paul Marks, "Dependence Day," New Scientist, 31 July 1999; see at: http://www.polyspace.com/PressRoom/newscientist.htm.

  170. Ada Information Clearinghouse, "Ada in Airbus 340 Flight Warning System," ITT Research Institute, 1994; see at: http://www.adahome.com/Ammo/Success/aerofws.html.

  171. H. Lin, "The development of software for ballistic-missile defense," Sci. Am. 253(December 1985):52.

  172. Vittorio Cortellessa, Bojan Cukic, Diego Del Gobbo, Ali Mili, Marcello Napolitano, Mark Shereshevsky, Harjinder Sandhu, "Certifying Adaptive Flight Control Software," see at: http://www.isacc.com/presentations/3c-bc.pdf.

  173. "An Introduction to Cryocide: The Complete Sanitizer and Deodoriser," Scotmas Ltd., Kelso, Scotland; see at: http://www.scotmas.force9.co.uk/0600.htm.

  174. Michael Rochon, Nancy Sullivan, "Products Based on Accelerated and Stabilized Hydrogen Peroxide: Evidence for Cleaning and Sanitizing Efficiency, Environmental and Human Safety and Non-Corrosiveness," Virox Technologies; see at: http://www.virox.com/articles/ashp.html.

  175. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), "Hydrogen Peroxide," in IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans: Allyl Compounds, Aldehydes, Epoxides and Peroxides, Vol. 36, IARC, Lyon, 1985, pp. 285-314.

  176. H. Hayatsu, T. Miyamae, M. Yamamura, "Heat production as a quantitative parameter of phagocytosis," J. Immunol. Methods 109(9 May 1988):157-160.

  177. Augusto Cogoli, Birgitt Bechler, Marianne Cogoli-Greuter, Sue B. Criswell, Helen Joller, Peter Joller, Elisabeth Hunzinger, Ottfried Muller, "Mitogenic signal transduction in T lymphocytes in microgravity," J. Leukocyte Biol. 53(May 1993):569-575.

  178. Dennis A. Carson, "Chapter 94. Composition and biochemistry of lymphocytes and plasma cells," in Ernest Beutler, Marshall A. Lichtman, Barry S. Coller, Thomas J. Kipps, eds., William's Hematology, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995, pp. 916-921.

  179. G.J. Cannon, J.A. Swanson, "The macrophage capacity for phagocytosis," J. Cell Sci. 101(April 1992):907-913.

  180. E.E. Schmidt, I.C. MacDonald, A.C. Groom, "Interactions of leukocytes with vessel walls and with other blood cells, studied by high-resolution intravital videomicroscopy of spleen," Microvasc. Res. 40(July 1990):99-117.

  181. J.E. Repine, C.C. Clawson, "Quantitative measurement of the bactericidal capability of neutrophils from patients and carriers of chronic granulomatous disease," J. Lab. Clin. Med. 90(September 1977):522-528.

  182. Kenneth J. Ryan, ed., Sherris Medical Microbiology: An Introduction to Infectious Diseases, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1994.

  183. Michael T. Madigan, John M. Martinko, Jack Parker, eds., Brock's Biology of Microorganisms, 9th Edition, Printice-Hall, NJ, 1999.

  184. A. Morris Hooke, D.O. Sordelli, M.C. Cerquetti, A.J. Vogt, "Quantitative determination of bacterial replication in vivo," Infect. Immun. 49(August 1985):424-427.

  185. D.O. Sordelli, M.C. Cerquetti, A.M. Hooke, "Replication rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the murine lung," Infect. Immun. 50(November 1985):388-391.

  186. Thomas M. Terry, "Mechanisms of Pathogenicity," 18 June 1999; see at: http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~terry/229sp99/pathogens.html.

  187. M.K. Yeung, S.J. Mattingly, "Isolation and characterization of type III group B streptococcal mutants defective in biosynthesis of the type-specific antigen," Infect. Immun. 42(October 1983):141-151.

  188. J. Colino, I. Outschoorn, "The form variation of the capsular polysaccharide K1 is not a critical virulence factor of E. coli in a neonatal mouse model of infection," Microb. Pathog. 27(October 1999):187-196.

  189. Robert A. Freitas Jr., "Is Diamond Biocompatible With Living Cells?" Foresight Update No. 39, 30 December 1999, pp. 7-9. See at: http://www.imm.org/Reports/Rep012.html. See also: http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMIIA/15.3.1.htm

  190. Robert A. Freitas Jr., "Will Serum Proteins Stick to Nanorobot Surfaces?" Foresight Update No. 42, 30 September 2000, pp. 12-14. See at: http://www.imm.org/Reports/Rep020.html. See also: http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMIIA/15.2.2.htm

  191. Robert A. Freitas Jr., "Nanopyrexia," Foresight Update No. 43, 30 December 2000, pp. 14-16. See at: http://www.imm.org/Reports/Rep022.html. See also: http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMIIA/15.2.7.htm

  192. Robert A. Freitas Jr., Nanomedicine, Volume IIA: Biocompatibility, Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX, 2003. See at: http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMIIA.htm

  193. Nolan B. Holland, Yongxing Qiu, Mark Ruegsegger, Roger E. Marchant, "Biomimetic engineering of nonadhesive glycocalyx-like surfaces using oligosaccharide surfactant polymers," Nature 392(23 April 1998):799-801.

  194. S. Irino, T. Murakami, T. Fujita, "Open circulation in the human spleen: Dissection scanning electron microscopy of conductive-stained tissue and observation of resin vascular casts," Arch. Histol. Jpn. 40(September 1977):297-304.

  195. G.R. Cokelet, Dynamics of erythrocyte motion in filtration tests and in vivo flow," Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 156(1981):77-82.

  196. Charles A. Linker, "Chapter 12. Blood," in Lawrence M. Tierney, Jr., Stephen J. McPhee, Maxine A. Papadakis, eds., Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment, 35th Edition, Appleton and Lange, Stamford, CT, 1996, pp. 434-488.

  197. D.E. Van Epps, B.R. Andersen, "Streptolysin O inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis and mobility: nonimmune phenomenon with species specificity," Infect. Immun. 9(January 1974):27-33; "Suppression of chemotactic activity of human neutrophils by streptolysin O," J. Infect. Dis. 125(April 1972):353-359.

  198. A. Odegaard, J. Lamvik, "The effect of phenylbutazone and chloramphenicol on phagocytosis of radiolabelled Candida albicans by human monocytes cultured in vitro," Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. C 84(February 1976):37-44.

  199. George T. Yates, "How Microorganisms Move through Water," Amer. Sci. 74(July-August 1986):358-365.

  200. P. Sherman, R. Soni, H. Yeger, "Characterization of flagella purified from enterohemorrhagic, vero-cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7," J. Clin. Microbiol. 26(July 1988):1367-1372.

  201. T.M. Joys, "Epitope mapping in Salmonella flagellar protein," SAAS Bull. Biochem. Biotechnol. 4(January 1991):56-59.

  202. M. Kostrzynska, J.D. Betts, J.W. Austin, T.J. Trust, "Identification, characterization, and spatial location of two flagellin species in Helicobacter pylori flagella," J. Bacteriol. 173(February 1991):937-946.

  203. S.M. Newton, R.D. Wasley, A Wilson, L.T. Rosenberg, J.F. Miller, B.A. Stocker, "Segment IV of a Salmonella flagellin gene specifies antigen epitopes," Mol. Microbiol. 5(February 1991):419-425.

  204. J.R. Saunders et al, "Flagella and pili as antigenically variable structures on the bacterial surface," J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74(1993):33S-42S.

  205. G.P. Boivin, R.R. Hook, L.K. Riley, "Antigenic diversity in flagellar epitopes among Bacillus piliformis isolates," J. Med. Microbiol. 38(March 1993):177-182.

  206. T.R. Anderson, T.C. Montie, "Flagellar antibody stimulated opsonophagocytosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa associated with response to either a- or b-type flagellar antigen" Can. J. Microbiol. 35(September 1989):890-894.

  207. T.L. Wyant, M.K. Tanner, M.B. Sztein, "Potent immunoregulatory effects of Salmonella typhi flagella on antigenic stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells," Infect. Immun. 67(March 1999):1338-1346.

  208. S.M. Vanderschueren, J.M. Stassen, D. Collen, "On the immunogenicity of recombinant staphylokinase in patients and in animal models," Thromb. Haemost. 72(August 1994):297-301.

  209. P. Sundstrom, J. Jensen, E. Balish, "Humoral and cellular immune responses to enolase after alimentary tract colonization or intravenous immunization with Candida albicans," J. Infect. Dis. 170(August 1994):390-395.

  210. M.A. Audrain, T.A. Baranger, C.M. Lockwood, V.L. Esnault, "High immunoreactivity of lactoferrin contaminating commercially purified myeloperoxidase," J. Immunol. Methods 176(10 November 1994):23-31; C.J. Thaler, C.A. Labarrere, J.S. Hunt, J.A. McIntyre, W.P. Faulk, "Immunological studies of lactoferrin in human placentae," J. Reprod. Immunol. 23(January 1993):21-39.

  211. A. Leake, C.M. Morris, J. Whateley, "Brain matrix metalloproteinase 1 levels are elevated in Alzheimer's disease," Neurosci. Lett. 291(22 September 2000):201-203.

  212. T.J. Nevalainen, M.M. Haapamaki, J.M. Gronroos, "Roles of secretory phospholipases A(2) in inflammatory diseases and trauma," Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1488(31 October 2000):83-90.

  213. T. Tozawa, "Enzyme-linked immunoglobulins and their clinical significance," Electrophoresis 10(August-September 1989):640-644.

  214. F. Balli, S. Gentilini, "Asymptomatic hypertransaminasemia," Pediatr. Med. Chir. 18(July-August 1996):363-364. In Italian.

  215. M. Monfort-Gouraud, A. Hamza, K. Nacer, G. Barjonnet, V. Tranie, M. Devanlay, G. Sauvageon, "Hypertransaminasemia in an adolescent," Arch. Pediatr. 6(November 1999):1191-1192. In French.

  216. J.L. Masferrer, K.M. Leahy, A.T. Koki, "Role of cyclooxygenases in angiogenesis," Curr. Med. Chem. 7(November 2000):1163-1170.

  217. E. Bingen, N. Lambert-Zechovsky, Y. Aujard, P. Mariani, G. Lemer, C. Sauzeau, H. Mathieu, "Early synergistic killing activity at concentrations attainable in CSF of amoxicillin or cefotaxime and aminoglycosides against Haemophilus influenzae," Infection 16(March-April 1988):121-125.

  218. R.S. Daum, D.W. Scheifele, V.P. Syriopoulou, D. Averill, A.L. Smith, "Ventricular involvement in experimental Hemophilus influenzae meningitis," J. Pediatr. 93(December 1978):927-930.

  219. R. Tuomanen, A. Tomasz, B. Hengstler, O. Zak, "The relative role of bacterial cell wall and capsule in the induction of inflammation in pneumococcal meningitis," J. Infect. Dis. 151(March 1985):535-540.

  220. P. Sulc, B. Hengstler, G. Krinke, T. O'Reilly, O. Zak, "Experimental rabbit model of meningitis produced by Haemophilus influenzae serotype c," J. Med. Microbiol. 36(May 1992):312-317.

  221. A.M. Shibl, C.J. Hackbarth, M.A. Sande, "Evaluation of pefloxacin in experimental Escherichia coli meningitis," Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 29(March 1986):409-411.

  222. B.C. Wessels, M.T. Wells, S.L. Gaffin, J.G. Brock-Utne, P. Gathiram, L.B. Hinshaw, "Plasma endotoxin concentration in healthy primates and during E. coli-induced shock," Crit. Care Med. 16(June 1988):601-605.

  223. O. Rokke, A. Revhaug, B. Osterud, K.E. Giercksky, "Increased plasma levels of endotoxin and corresponding changes in circulatory performance in a porcine sepsis model: the effect of antibiotic administration," Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 272(1988):247-262.

  224. L. Aussel, R. Chaby, K. Le Blay, J. Kelly, P. Thibault, M.B. Perry, M. Caroff, "Chemical and serological characterization of the bordetella hinzii lipopolysaccharides," FEBS Lett. 485(17 November 2000):40-46.

  225. J.T.M. Frieling, J.A. Mulder, T. Hendriks, J.H.A.J. Curfs, C.J. van der Linden, R.W. Sauerwein, "Differential Induction of Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines in Whole Blood by Bacteria: Effects of Antibiotic Treatment," Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41(July 1997):1439-1443.

  226. J. Hulkkonen, P. Laippala, M. Hurne, "A rare allele combination of the interleukin-1 gene complex is associated with high interleukin-1b plasma levels in healthy individuals," Eur. Cytokine Netw. 11(April 2000):251-255.

  227. J.W. Costerton, Philip S. Stewart, E.P. Greenberg, "Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections," Science 284(21 May 1999):1318-1322.

  228. J.W. Costerton, Z. Lewandowski, D.E. Caldwell, D.R. Korber, H.M. Lappin-Scott, "Microbial biofilms," Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49(1995):711-745.

  229. Robert A. Freitas Jr., "Say Ah!" The Sciences 40(July/August 2000):26-31. See at: http://www.foresight.org/Nanomedicine/SayAh/index.html

  230. H.L. Butt, R.L. Clancy, A.W. Cripps, K. Murree-Allen, N.A. Saunders, D.C. Sutherland, M.J. Hensley, "Bacterial colonisation of the respiratory tract in chronic bronchitis," Aust. N. Z. J. Med. 20(February 1990):35-38.

  231. A. Watanabe, K. Oizumi, M. Motomiya, T. Sato, M. Shoji, "Studies on respiratory infections in primary care clinic (II). Distribution and antibiotic sensitivity to 45 agents of bacteria isolated from patients with respiratory infections visiting a doctor in private practice," Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 64(January 1990):66-75. In Japanese.

  232. A.G. Arguedas, J.C. Akaniro, H.R. Stutman, M.I. Marks, "In vitro activity of tosufloxacin, a new quinolone, against respiratory pathogens derived from cystic fibrosis sputum," Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34(November 1990):2223-2227.

  233. E.L. Spada, A. Tinivella, S. Carli, S. Zaccaria, M. Lusuardi, A. Sbaffi, C.F. Donner, "Proposal of an easy method to improve routine sputum bacteriology," Respiration 56(1989):137-146.

  234. R. Wilson, R. Read, P. Cole, "Interaction of Haemophilus influenzae with mucus, cilia, and respiratory epithelium," J. Infect. Dis. 165(June 1992):S100-S102.

  235. C. Strange, S.A. Sahn, "The definitions and epidemiology of pleural space infection," Semin. Respir. Infect. 14(March 1999):3-8; S.A. Sasse, L.A. Causing, M.E. Mulligan, R.W. Light, "Serial pleural fluid analysis in a new experimental model of empyema," Chest 109(April 1996):1043-1048; P.J. Spagnuolo, V.D. Payne, "Clostridial pleuropulmonary infection," Chest 78(October 1980):622-625.

  236. L. Carreno Perez, "Septic arthritis," Baillieres Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 13(March 1999):37-58.

  237. R. Platt, "Quantitative definition of bacteriuria," Am. J. Med. 75(28 July 1983):44-52.

  238. D.L. Gordon, P.J. McDonald, A. Bune, V.R. Marshall, B. Grime, J. Marsh, G. Sinclair, "Diagnostic criteria and natural history of catheter-associated urinary tract infections after prostatectomy," Lancet 2(3 December 1983):1269-1271.

  239. B. Ramratnam et al, "Rapid production and clearance of HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus assessed by large volume plasma apheresis," Lancet 354(20 November 1999):1782-1785.

  240. G. Doring, S. Jansen, H. Noll, H. Grupp, F. Frank, K. Botzenhart, K. Magdorf, U. Wahn, "Distribution and transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia in a hospital ward," Pediatr. Pulmonol. 21(February 1996):90-100.

  241. H. Hoshikawa, R. Kamiya, "Elastic properties of bacterial flagellar filaments. II. Determination of the modulus of rigidity," Biophys. Chem. 22(August 1985):159-166.

  242. A. Iwagaki, M. Porro, M. Pollack, "Influence of synthetic antiendotoxin peptides on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) recognition and LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokine responses by cells expressing membrane-bound CD14," Infect. Immun. 68(March 2000):1655-1663.

  243. T.A. Kellogg, V. Lazaron, K.R. Wasiluk, D.L. Dunn, "Binding specificity of polymyxin B, BP, LALF, and anti-deep core/lipid a monoclonal antibody to lipopolysaccharide partial structures," Shock 15(February 2001):124-129.

  244. B.C. Lee, "Quelling the red menace: haem capture by bacteria," Mol. Microbiol. 18(November 1995):383-390.

  245. S. Hara, J.J. Plantner, E.L. Kean, "The enzymatic cleavage of rhodopsin by the retinal pigment epithelium. I. Enzyme preparation, properties and kinetics: characterization of the glycopeptide product," Exp. Eye Res. 36(June 1983):799-816.

  246. Charles A. Janeway, "The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self," Immunol. Today 13(January 1992):11-16.

  247. Alan Aderem, David M. Underhill, "Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages," Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17(1999):593-623.

Copyright 2001-2004 Robert A. Freitas Jr. All Rights Reserved


2005 Journal of Evolution and Technology.  All Rights Reserved.

Published by the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Mailing Address: James Hughes Ph.D., Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA

ISSN: 1541-0099  Reprint and Permissions